We performed a comparison between JBoss and Oracle WebLogic Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Server solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product's initial setup phase is easy."
"The product integrates well with Java applications."
"The solution is easy to use."
"There's good documentation and a pretty good community surrounding the product."
"JBoss's configuration is straightforward and easy."
"The high availability is great."
"The stability is great."
"The solution's support is very good for repairing components."
"The only difference is that Weblogic is lighter and consumes less memory."
"The solution works well in load balancing."
"In the newer system, reconfigurability and the fact that it is easy to configure, make it very valuable."
"Helps in efficient load distribution"
"Oracle WebLogic Server has a bunch of ready features that are easy to use and understand."
"We've got the support we require. If ever there is an issue, can just call on Oracle and they will assist us."
"It's a scalable product."
"What I find most valuable in Oracle WebLogic Server is its flexibility in administering and managing applications, along with the built-in dashboards that offer high visibility into vulnerabilities."
"In general, the support of the ERPC would be really good due to the fact that, so far, I have not seen it."
"There is not much ability inside of the solution. The world is going beyond different micro and data-type things like Microsoft Office, so we are not seeing much ability within the solution."
"The stability of the solution could improve with Microsoft Windows."
"The solution's pricing could be improved because it is not cheap."
"The solution's documentation could be better."
"The login process could be improved."
"In terms of monitoring, the old version was somewhat limited in flexibility, lacking the ability to easily adjust configurations."
"The initial setup is a bit complex."
"Oracle WebLogic Server's configuration could be improved because we need to do multiple configurations when setting up anything."
"Its pricing should be better. We are analyzing other options, such as JBoss, because of the cost of WebLogic."
"Having clearer mechanisms to directly map a database-level connection problem to the corresponding WebLogic thread would greatly enhance the administrator's convenience."
"Licensing fees need improvement."
"The logs consultant, since it tends to be more in the server, we do need complete consult logs for a lot of different files."
"The administration is hard, and it is more complex to use than others."
"The cost could always be lower."
"There's a bug related to the managed services."
JBoss is ranked 3rd in Application Server with 24 reviews while Oracle WebLogic Server is ranked 1st in Application Server with 33 reviews. JBoss is rated 8.4, while Oracle WebLogic Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of JBoss writes "A flexible and stable solution that is cost-efficient compared to other products". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle WebLogic Server writes "Offers efficient load distribution with a scope of high scalability ". JBoss is most compared with Tomcat, IBM WebSphere Application Server, IIS, Oracle GlassFish and TmaxSoft JEUS, whereas Oracle WebLogic Server is most compared with Tomcat, Oracle Application Server, Oracle Fusion Middleware, IBM WebSphere Application Server and IIS. See our JBoss vs. Oracle WebLogic Server report.
See our list of best Application Server vendors.
We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
