Jitterbit Harmony vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Jitterbit Logo
476 views|397 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
5,919 views|2,787 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Jitterbit Harmony and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Microsoft, Oracle and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS).
To learn more, read our detailed Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is very easy to build integrations and processes to pull and push data.""It runs like an appliance and has tremendous throughput.""Jitterbit handles the most lines of data in a .csv and loads the quickest of any data loader I have tried.""Integrity, ease of use, user-friendly user interface, and errorless logs are the most valuable features.""Easy integration with Salesforce""The Cloud Console for monitoring and troubleshooting data operations.""Jitterbit provides the ability to quickly map data between files and databases.""We only use small parts of the solution, however, the parts that we use are quite adequate."

More Jitterbit Harmony Pros →

"If there's something that isn't possible, you can write some code and call that code from a Logic App.""The solution has plenty of good valuable features and a plethora of services.""Logic Apps is valuable because my team uses it for integrating SaaS tool sets.""The product has efficient connectors.""The product’s most valuable feature is integration.""We mainly used it to integrate SAP, ServiceNow, and different third-party APIs with the front end.""Connectors are very useful for streamlining data integration tasks.""The solution's most valuable feature is the no-code/low-code feature."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Pros →

Cons
"You need to have some development skills or hire a Jitterbit engineer to make changes.""I would like the ability to offer a dedicated cloud version for security.""The initial setup can be a little bit difficult.""Looping through complex data structures can be difficult.""I know with Salesforce updating the UI like they did, it slowed it down a lot.""Sometimes we experience disconnections and I have to close all Jitterbit programs.""In the past few months, there have been some server downtimes during work hours that have affected some critical scheduled integrations.""Its API management capabilities need improvement."

More Jitterbit Harmony Cons →

"We wanted to use Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, but we faced a timeout.""It's for a limited kind of application or short Apps. And, not for the complex applications.""The pricing could be improved.""Standard documents are fine, but in certain situations, when facing specific errors or issues, partners or consumers expect customized solutions rather than just links to existing documents.""Especially when using a function or a parameter, that could be easier as that's not very well-documented, and it's not very clear from the tool itself how to use it.""There could be more AI features included in the product.""A room for improvement in Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is that it's expensive. Every step is going to cost you money, so if someone is not doing the steps carefully, at the end of the day, it will cost a lot of money. Each time you execute a step, the cost will depend on how much you use Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, and how many workflow steps you have. Each time a step needs to be executed, there'll be a cost added to your bill. If the developer isn't careful with how he uses the solution, this can blow up the cost. What I'd like to see in the next release of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is for the cost and security to be better.""The solution should include more connectors."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Each business needs to determine if it is a mission critical aspect."
  • "The added bonus is that Jitterbit doesn't charge for any data volume/traffic."
  • "I do believe Jitterbit has one of the better pricing and licensing options out there compared to its competitors."
  • "Jitterbit was extremely cost effective for us compared to other options."
  • "The Jitterbit price is based upon endpoints. They also offer ERP connectors with their Enterprise edition"
  • "The solution's cost is mid-ranged compared to other vendors."
  • More Jitterbit Harmony Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The cost of the solution could be cheaper."
  • "If we are comparing to other public cloud vendors, such as Amazon or Google Cloud platform, I wouldn't say that it's expensive. However, when we're comparing between a host such as GoDaddy or Digital Ocean, then it's a bit on the expensive side."
  • "It's very cheap, but it comes with pluses and minuses. The positive thing is that it's very cheap, but on the other hand, it's extremely hard to tell how much it will cost. At the start of the project, it's almost impossible to tell how many times you will be calling some kind of Logic App function. You cannot state how much of the internet transfer you will use or how much data your will use."
  • "The price of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is inexpensive."
  • "Microsoft Azure Logic Apps could be costly if a user isn't careful. The costs associated with the solution could still be improved."
  • "The product is not cheap. I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."
  • "The pricing is not expensive."
  • "The pricing is okay. It's not highly priced. It's in the medium range."
  • More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution's cost is mid-ranged compared to other vendors. I rate its pricing a six out of ten.
    Top Answer:The solution's API management capabilities need improvement.
    Top Answer:The solution's most valuable feature is the no-code/low-code feature.
    Top Answer:The tool's cost can vary depending on your specific use case. Generally, it's considered cheaper, but the price depends on how much you use it and which features you need. Initially, there was a… more »
    Top Answer:Not all connectors are readily available, though. There are two types: managed connectors and app connectors. Some connectors require you to provide a username and password to connect to platforms… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    476
    Comparisons
    397
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    234
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    5,919
    Comparisons
    2,787
    Reviews
    23
    Average Words per Review
    477
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Jitterbit, Jitterbit Harmony
    Azure Logic Apps, MS Azure Logic Apps
    Learn More
    Overview

    Open source integration platform designed to handle the most complex integration challenges between legacy, enterprise and On-Demand applications. 

    Connect your business-critical apps and services with Azure Logic Apps, automating your workflows without writing a single line of code.

    Sample Customers
    LA Metro, Mophie, Club Auto, University of Miami, Exostar, Dialog Direct, Avero, Greenpoint Technologies, Berklee Online, Odyssey, KeyedIn Solutions, Swish Maintenance, SPP Pumps Limited, Talent Plus, Ricoh Canada, Televerde, Reed Construction Data, Sika US, Sunkist Growers
    nord lock, mission linen supply, esmart systems
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Healthcare Company10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company38%
    Energy/Utilities Company13%
    Marketing Services Firm6%
    Healthcare Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization33%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Government5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business67%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise57%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business48%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise45%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise39%
    Large Enterprise47%
    Buyer's Guide
    Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Microsoft, Oracle and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS). Updated: May 2024.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Jitterbit Harmony is ranked 13th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 13 reviews while Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is ranked 2nd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 31 reviews. Jitterbit Harmony is rated 8.6, while Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Jitterbit Harmony writes "An easy-to-setup solution with good stability ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps writes "Has different connectors for workflow and comes with low-code feature". Jitterbit Harmony is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Azure Data Factory, Mule Anypoint Platform, SnapLogic and TIBCO Scribe, whereas Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, Boomi iPaaS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Cloud Platform and Talend Data integration.

    See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

    We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.