We performed a comparison between Jitterbit Harmony and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Workload Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is very easy to build integrations and processes to pull and push data."
"It runs like an appliance and has tremendous throughput."
"The Cloud Console for monitoring and troubleshooting data operations."
"We only use small parts of the solution, however, the parts that we use are quite adequate."
"Jitterbit provides the ability to quickly map data between files and databases."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The fluid user interface (probably the most user friendly interface, when compared to its competitors)."
"Integrity, ease of use, user-friendly user interface, and errorless logs are the most valuable features."
"It is a stable product...The initial setup was simple."
"MuleSoft offers with the Anypoint Platform a unified platform for API management and an integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) as well as an on-premise Enterprise Service Bus pattern."
"MuleSoft Anypoint Platform's most valuable features are its observability and stability."
"Mule Anypoint Platform's valuable features are its flexibility in terms of deployment and its SaaS capabilities."
"The most valuable feature is their integrations and very good API management."
"The ability to define multi-tiered APIs and reuse them is a fantastic platform feature."
"The integration potential is excellent."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is a huge list of available connectors for a lot of different platforms, which we can use very easily."
"I would like the ability to offer a dedicated cloud version for security."
"You need to have some development skills or hire a Jitterbit engineer to make changes."
"Looping through complex data structures can be difficult."
"Sometimes additional connectors are needed."
"There were some bugs in the product. For example if you run a delete query and test, it deletes the actual data."
"Sometimes we experience disconnections and I have to close all Jitterbit programs."
"Its API management capabilities need improvement."
"The initial setup can be a little bit difficult."
"The terms of use and how it's priced has become very difficult to manage, which is forcing us to look for alternatives already - and we haven't even been using it for that long just yet."
"The high price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Its documentation needed a little bit of work to make it more usable. It is a platform that is used mainly by developers and other people for connecting systems. Its documentation was confusing in some areas and was not very helpful in other areas. I had to go to a consultant to get some work done, which ideally shouldn't be required."
"What I hear from my customers is that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites. The cost keeps increasing. MuleSoft should come up with customization factors by using a different way of getting the cost-related stuff to attract customers. That is, they should come up with some cost optimizations."
"Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having more up-to-date adapters to do work in a digital space."
"The platform's data integration tools need improvement on the processing side."
"The initial setup should be made easy and the documentation should have some guidance."
"I would like to see some data integration and automation."
Jitterbit Harmony is ranked 21st in Workload Automation with 13 reviews while Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 8th in Workload Automation with 41 reviews. Jitterbit Harmony is rated 8.6, while Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Jitterbit Harmony writes "An easy-to-setup solution with good stability ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". Jitterbit Harmony is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Azure Data Factory, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, SnapLogic and TIBCO Scribe, whereas Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration and SAP Cloud Platform. See our Jitterbit Harmony vs. Mule Anypoint Platform report.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors, best Cloud Data Integration vendors, and best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.