We performed a comparison between Matillion ETL and webMethods.io Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Matillion ETL has great Git integration that is perfect and convenient to use."
"We allow non-technical people to use Matillion to load data into our data warehouse for reporting. Thus, it is easy enough to use that we don't always have to get a technical person involved in setting up a data movement (ETL)."
"It takes less than five minutes to set up and delivers results. It is much quicker than traditional ETL technologies."
"The new version with the Productivity Cloud is very simple. It's easy to use, navigate, and understand."
"The most valuable feature of Matillion ETL is the UI experience in which you can drag and drop most of the transformation."
"The product has a good user interface."
"Matillion ETL helps manage data movement, ingestion, and transformation through pipelines."
"It is pretty user-friendly, even for people who aren't super technical."
"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."
"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."
"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."
"The solution is scalable."
"Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."
"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."
"I like the tool's scalability."
"Performance can be improved for efficiency, and it can be made faster."
"I found some of the more complex aspects of ETL challenging, but I grasped the concepts fairly quickly."
"While the UI is good, it could be improved in its efficiency and made easier to use."
"Sometimes, we have issues with the solution's stability and need to restart it for three weeks or more."
"Going forward, I would like them to add custom jobs, since we still have to run these outside of Matillion."
"The tool's lineage is very weak."
"The current version is a bit more limited because it's on a virtual machine, and everything executes on that one virtual machine."
"Matillion’s on-premises capabilities don’t allow you to build something customized."
"It is difficult to maintain."
"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."
"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."
"The solution's release management feature could be better."
"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."
"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."
"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
Matillion ETL is ranked 4th in Cloud Data Integration with 24 reviews while webMethods.io Integration is ranked 23rd in Cloud Data Integration with 7 reviews. Matillion ETL is rated 8.6, while webMethods.io Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Matillion ETL writes "Efficient data integration and transformation with seamless cloud-native integration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable". Matillion ETL is most compared with Snowflake, Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, SSIS and Informatica PowerCenter, whereas webMethods.io Integration is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, SAP Cloud Platform, Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps. See our Matillion ETL vs. webMethods.io Integration report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.