We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure Block Storage and Wasabi based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The setup is straightforward."
"The initial setup is very simple and straightforward."
"The tool is most valuable for scenarios involving logs and monitoring. For example, logs are generated when using services like Front Door."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Azure Block Storage are flexibility and the possibility to trigger actions."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure Block Storage is its performance."
"It has capabilities such as versioning and, from a security point of view, you can also back it up."
"The product offers hierarchical storage and we like the main space storage with business."
"What I like best about Microsoft Azure Block Storage is the accessibility because it's very easy for me to access it. You'll find different resources and documentation about the tool if you need to learn how to start."
"Wasabi is an easy-to-use solution."
"Basically, I set Wasabi up and forget it. I'll monitor it every once in a while just to make sure that it's working correctly."
"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is its cost."
"We can store our videos on hot storage, allowing immediate access to them."
"The tool is very user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is the backups."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"Data gathering features could be improved."
"Microsoft Azure Block Storage could improve the SFTP. The SFTP can be used for exchanging data between two parties and it works but Microsoft is new to this market and they could be a lot better in this area with its features."
"Microsoft Azure Block Storage could improve by allowing the switching of the hot tier to the cold tier."
"The cost of the solution has room for improvement. Microsoft Azure Block Storage is priced higher than alternative solutions."
"I would like for the next release to replace the CDN being used for content delivery, there is currently a rather long delay."
"The support response time could be quicker."
"Improving the pricing structure would be beneficial."
"There is a drawback or limitation to the GRS storage feature because depending on the amount of data, it could take a lot of time."
"The solution’s user reporting could be improved."
"The solution must allow the extension of the retention period."
"Setting up users on the appliance should be improved."
"The scalability could be improved."
"I don't have enough experience to understand the nuances of where they might improve."
"The scalability could improve."
"Having the ability to upload and download data using third-party apps such as Mega which can sync to the desktop would be excellent."
More Microsoft Azure Block Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Azure Block Storage is ranked 7th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 56 reviews while Wasabi is ranked 8th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 7 reviews. Microsoft Azure Block Storage is rated 8.0, while Wasabi is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Block Storage writes "A stable and widely accepted solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wasabi writes "An easy-to-use solution that can be used to move local backups to the cloud". Microsoft Azure Block Storage is most compared with Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store), Rackspace Cloud Block Storage, Amazon S3 Glacier, Azure NetApp Files and Zadara, whereas Wasabi is most compared with Microsoft Azure File Storage, Amazon S3 Glacier, Google Cloud Storage, Amazon S3 and Google Cloud Storage Nearline. See our Microsoft Azure Block Storage vs. Wasabi report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
