We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure DevOps and OpenText AccuRev based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Azure is an advantage when working with other Microsoft solutions."
"Provides agile management of projects."
"It's a pretty problem-free solution."
"The features of Azure Repos that we find most impactful are those related to source control management within our DevOps code management processes."
"The initial setup is very easy."
"I like the tracking and that we can monitor our velocity."
"The most valuable aspect of Azure DevOps for me is its robust version control functionality, which is critical for our workflow."
"The one thing that really stands out to me is how you can filter and how you can do your reporting and filter the tasks and everything by user."
"The product has all the features that we for application managementat a lower cost."
"The solution is 100% scalable. It's much more scalable than the customer's capacity for implementing it. We do plan to increase usage ourselves."
"The most valuable feature is the Business Process Testing feature, BPT, because it brings in the most revenue."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is taking snapshots while doing the execution of the test cases."
"Being more technology-agnostic through ease of integration would be beneficial."
"Better integration with the Linux operating system would be an improvement for this solution."
"Microsoft could focus on refining the reporting and dashboard elements of Azure DevOps to improve it."
"The active directory password system needs some improvement because many times the password for the active directory expires before the set time."
"This product would be improved if the helpdesk were included."
"There are certain areas in Azure DevOps that are better in other products."
"I think that they have some menus there that are not very well placed."
"The user management in the solution could improve."
"The pricing should be more competitive."
"What I'm missing from the solution is a repository for the code. Something like Git, for example. Some sort of depository for the code that is embedded."
"In the next release, I would like to have a repository for the code which is embedded. Apart from that, it has everything I need."
"It is difficult to gain experience with the product because resources and documentation for learning are not available."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft Azure DevOps is ranked 2nd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 127 reviews while OpenText AccuRev is ranked 23rd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Microsoft Azure DevOps is rated 8.2, while OpenText AccuRev is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure DevOps writes "Allows us to deploy code to production without releasing certain features immediately and agile project management capabilities offer resource-leveling". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText AccuRev writes "Good packaging features, but reporting is limited". Microsoft Azure DevOps is most compared with GitLab, Jira, TFS, Rally Software and ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, whereas OpenText AccuRev is most compared with Jama Connect. See our Microsoft Azure DevOps vs. OpenText AccuRev report.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.