We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure DevOps and PractiTest based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Monitoring is most valuable."
"Before using this solution, we had to deploy our applications, from pre-production to production, manually."
"Stable and scalable solution for work planning and code collaboration. It's fast, and it offers a good user experience."
"I think the most usable thing is that you can follow the whole progress of the development process. This makes it very useful for us."
"The solution is scalable."
"Typically the sprints themselves and managing the tasks have essentially eliminated our need for reporting."
"I like the cloud infrastructure of Microsoft Azure DevOps."
"The most valuable feature is the complete integration between test cases, pipelines, and issue management."
"The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."
"Some things like project management, tasks, progress, and having work progress views require us to use some external tools, or to create our own internal tools. These are not native to DevOps. It would be ideal if, instead of searching for third-party solutions, they had these feature sets or capabilities included under DevOps."
"Its interface could be more user-friendly. It could be simplified for users with no prior knowledge. There should also be better tutorials."
"There are certain features, and reporting that can only be used in PowerBI, but not directly in DevOps."
"I want DevOps to have more automated reminders about tasks that don't need management. We don't have reminders, so a project manager must track the tasks. It's not automatic."
"In comparison to JIRA, I believe DevOps has very poor reporting and metrics support."
"They have to add more features such as schedules and more flexibility in the platform."
"Being more technology-agnostic through ease of integration would be beneficial."
"With Microsoft, I would prefer to have more test plans. It's very difficult to find individual test plan module training."
"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft Azure DevOps is ranked 2nd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 127 reviews while PractiTest is ranked 20th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Microsoft Azure DevOps is rated 8.2, while PractiTest is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure DevOps writes "Allows us to deploy code to production without releasing certain features immediately and agile project management capabilities offer resource-leveling". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PractiTest writes "Offers one click graphical dashboard reports and advanced customization". Microsoft Azure DevOps is most compared with GitLab, Jira, TFS, Rally Software and ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, whereas PractiTest is most compared with TestRail, Jira and Zephyr Enterprise. See our Microsoft Azure DevOps vs. PractiTest report.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.