We performed a comparison between Microsoft Dynamics CRM and Sage CRM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two CRM solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Microsoft Dynamics CRM has plenty of valuable features."
"The product is user-friendly."
"Our clients appreciate that the solution can be used to monitor everything their customer interacts with in their business."
"Microsoft Dynamics CRM is a stable solution."
"The history of engagement with our customers, including all conversations, has been most valuable when using this solution."
"The most valuable features are the integration capabilities with other third-party software. It has an easy user interface and in terms of security, it has permission-based access for different users."
"Microsoft Dynamics CRM brings the most value in terms of its ease of implementation."
"The most valuable feature in Microsoft Dynamics CRM is funneling."
"The most useful aspect of Sage CRM is the capability to keep track of each staff member's communication and bill processing activities. The ability to track both customers and employees is a useful tool."
"The part I like the most is the reporting."
"The solution's technical support is fast to respond."
"We have found the solution to be stable."
"Sage CRM is flexible, customizable, and user-friendly."
"It has been helpful for opportunity management and lease management."
"The Sage Accpac solution has definitely been the most valuable because the finance features are excellent."
"A built-in automation engine to automate parts of workflows would be beneficial. That's the feature I'd be most happy to see expanded. It's currently tagged as simple automation, but I'd love some predictive capability."
"Sometimes Microsoft's support can be difficult to contact, and it can take a while to get a response to a ticket."
"The solution's interface has room for improvement."
"We would like to see the tech support for this product improved, at present we are frequently waiting for a couple of days before we receive any response."
"Technical support could be faster and more responsive."
"The approvals component of Dynamics is complex. It isn't very easy to generate approvals between different departments."
"Microsoft Dynamics CRM would be far superior if it had an analytical dashboard and AI-based systems."
"When it comes to any necessary changes or updates, we have issues. It is not very agnostic in terms of working with other platforms. A lot of data transformation had to be done internally in order to send it to various systems."
"I would like Sage to improve their UI."
"Sage CRM doesn't have a dashboard for dynamic reporting."
"The scalability of this solution depends on whether you have a team that can configure it for scale."
"Its user interface could be better."
"Sage CRM would benefit from improving its interaction with email communication sites and social media platforms in order to gather more leads."
"From an improvement perspective, the ability to make modifications to the product needs to be more user-friendly."
"With regards to monitoring the transaction with alerts, it could be better."
Microsoft Dynamics CRM is ranked 2nd in CRM with 68 reviews while Sage CRM is ranked 19th in CRM with 7 reviews. Microsoft Dynamics CRM is rated 7.8, while Sage CRM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics CRM writes "Intuitive APIs, customizable design, but dashboards could improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sage CRM writes "Useful employee and client monitoring, reliable, and good online support database ". Microsoft Dynamics CRM is most compared with Salesforce Sales Cloud, SAP CRM, ServiceNow, Siebel CRM and monday.com, whereas Sage CRM is most compared with Oracle CX Sales. See our Microsoft Dynamics CRM vs. Sage CRM report.
See our list of best CRM vendors.
We monitor all CRM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.