We performed a comparison between Microsoft Entra ID Protection and SentinelOne Singularity Identity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool is simple and you can find a lot of tutorials, and videos on YouTube that can help you."
"The reverse proxy feature provides additional security that is not available in other solutions."
"The solution helps us with authentication."
"The primary and most valuable aspect of Azure AD identity is its ability to function seamlessly on both on-premise and cloud infrastructure, eliminating the need for extensive updates. However, this dual solution can pose vulnerabilities that require substantial support and security measures in the on-premise environment. Despite the challenges, it is currently not feasible to completely abandon AD, especially for companies in the sales and energy sectors. The integration with Microsoft Defender is crucial for enhancing security, making identity and security the primary focus and purpose of Azure AD."
"I use conditional access most of the time."
"Having high visibility into all of our network concerns and a customizable UI are the most valuable features."
"The threat detection capability is the most valuable feature."
"SentinelOne Singularity Identity is very lightweight as an agent or software."
"They have different levels of support. We have the highest level where they are constantly checking all the endpoints. If at any certain point, they identify that a computer has been triggered by a virus, a link, or something else, they would automatically tell us that within 15 seconds. If they notice something, they automatically send us an email saying that they noticed something in the computer, and they are going to block it."
"All the features within the XDR are valuable as a whole for our organization."
"The incident and threat logs are great."
"The biggest value for us is getting a much better picture of what our risks are."
"The XDR capabilities are very good."
"The solution's sync should be faster since it can take about 30 minutes to two hours to complete a simple sync. The tool needs to sync instantly. It also needs to improve scalability, support, and stability."
"Identity labeling and sensitivity needs improvement."
"Integrating some notifications, not necessarily all, but at least for important events or alerts, would be beneficial as it would function as a team solution or something similar."
"The solution is not optimized to work with Mac devices on a granular level. They work seamlessly with Windows but have a lot to improve to work with Mac devices. It also needs to improve stability and scalability."
"Azure AD could improve by enhancing the availability of specialized courses for security, such as NETSCOUT security or other relevant certifications. It would be beneficial to have specific courses for security, to provide in-depth knowledge and skills related to Azure AD. While there are micro-learning resources available for various concepts, many people in the IT industry may not have the time to go through all the courses to properly configure and utilize Azure Active Directory. Simplifying the implementation process and making it easier for individuals to join a company with Azure AD could also be considered areas for improvement."
"A lot of those features came from an acquisition of a different company."
"SentinelOne Singularity Identity could be more user-friendly."
"The policies could be more precise, and Singularity should use more templates like alternative solutions have. Endpoint management is poor. We cannot manage individual endpoints and must rely on policies, exclusions, or block lists to apply settings to a group instead of the individual agent. If I have to make settings for one computer, I need to create a group, apply the configuration, and move the agent there. It's challenging to manage endpoints that way."
"Our engineers are dealing with issues to add exclusions to the antivirus for custom applications."
"We haven't received the expected support whenever we've had questions."
"Sometimes I get kicked out of the console. I don't know why."
"The UI can be more user-friendly."
"I don't like SentinelOne's reporting tools. Their reports seem fine theoretically, but the issue is the sample size. For example, it will report that there were four incidents, and that equals 25 percent fewer incidents compared to the previous months. It would be a great improvement if I could expand the range to see reports for the last six months, but it's always one month. That would be an easy thing for them to resolve."
More Microsoft Entra ID Protection Pricing and Cost Advice →
More SentinelOne Singularity Identity Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Entra ID Protection is ranked 2nd in Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) with 5 reviews while SentinelOne Singularity Identity is ranked 5th in Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) with 14 reviews. Microsoft Entra ID Protection is rated 8.4, while SentinelOne Singularity Identity is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Entra ID Protection writes "Enables smooth user sign-on experience, seamlessly deployment, and scales well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SentinelOne Singularity Identity writes "It offers deep and continuous visibility into our attack surface". Microsoft Entra ID Protection is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Identity, CrowdStrike Identity Protection, BloodHound Enterprise, Microsoft Entra Permissions Management and Microsoft Sentinel, whereas SentinelOne Singularity Identity is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Identity, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Vulnerability Management and Microsoft Defender for Office 365. See our Microsoft Entra ID Protection vs. SentinelOne Singularity Identity report.
See our list of best Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) vendors.
We monitor all Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.