We performed a comparison between Microsoft Entra Permissions Management and Microsoft Sentinel based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft and others in Microsoft Security Suite."Multifactor authentication is valuable."
"The log analysis is excellent; it can predict what can or will happen regarding use patterns and vulnerabilities."
"The UI of Sentinel is very good and easy to use, even for beginners."
"Its inbuilt Kusto Query Language is a valuable feature. It provides the flexibility needed to leverage advanced data analytics rules and policies and enables us to easily navigate all our security events in a single view. It helps any user easily understand the data or any security lags in their data and applications."
"The solution has features that helped improve the security posture of our clients. It provides the ability to correlate a large variety of log sources very cost-effectively, especially for Microsoft sources."
"Mainly, this is a cloud-native product. So, there are zero concerns about managing the whole infrastructure on-premises."
"It's pretty powerful and its performance is pretty good."
"The analytics has a lot of advantages because there are 300 default use cases for rules and we can modify them per our environment. We can create other rules as well. Analytics is a useful feature."
"We have no complaints about the features or functionality."
"We use a third-party API called Nebula API to integrate the account for authorization. The time-bound access area in Entra can be a problem. It can be improved in terms of the granularity of the permissions."
"It could have a better API to be able to automate many things more extensively and get more extensive data and more expensive deployment possibilities. It can gain some points on the automation part and the integration part. The API is very limited, and I would like to see it extended a bit more."
"We'd like also a better ticketing system, which is older."
"The troubleshooting has room for improvement."
"The data connectors for third-party tools could be improved, as some aren't available in Sentinel. They need to be available in the data connector panel."
"We'd like to see more connectors."
"In terms of features I would like to see in future releases, I'm interested in a few more use cases around automation. I do believe a lot of automation is available, and more is in progress, but that would be my area of interest."
"I believe one of the challenges I encountered was the absence of live training sessions, even with the option to pay for them."
"The only thing is sometimes you can have a false positive."
More Microsoft Entra Permissions Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Entra Permissions Management is ranked 26th in Microsoft Security Suite with 1 review while Microsoft Sentinel is ranked 6th in Microsoft Security Suite with 86 reviews. Microsoft Entra Permissions Management is rated 7.0, while Microsoft Sentinel is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Entra Permissions Management writes "Provides resource-based access and security, but time-bound access can be a problem". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Sentinel writes "Gives a comprehensive and holistic view of the ecosystem and improves visibility and the ability to respond". Microsoft Entra Permissions Management is most compared with SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Microsoft Identity Manager, Saviynt, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Microsoft Entra ID Protection, whereas Microsoft Sentinel is most compared with AWS Security Hub, IBM Security QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Elastic Security.
See our list of best Microsoft Security Suite vendors.
We monitor all Microsoft Security Suite reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.