We performed a comparison between Microsoft .NET Framework and NGINX Plus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The Windows Communication Foundation is the biggest advantage we get from the .NET Framework."
"The solution is easy to use if the user is a developer or some technical person."
"Basically, .NET is simply is the easiest programming language to use, based on my experience."
"User-friendly and straightforward."
"The most valuable feature is the financial accounting."
"If we take low code, no code platform such as RPA platforms, you might end up writing 100 lines of code and you might do it in a single line of code using. NET."
"It is a stable solution."
"The .NET framework is a mature platform that is very helpful and saves time during the software development process."
"The most valuable features are the gateway and the ability to publish to sites."
"Nginx is simple to configure, very stable in a highly utilized environment and very modular, allowing DevOps to create it's own modules for interactive use with Nginx."
"Supports IMAP, POP and SMTP protocols for the reverse proxy."
"Valuable features include authentication, caching, reverse proxy routing, and load balancing."
"When I worked in a security research center, we tested NGINX to support DoS and DDoS attacks, and its results were great."
"When you use NGINX, you have more options and power."
"The robust software architecture allows for it to be scalable and very stable."
"The load balancing module, which is equivalent to LTM, is the focus of the PSE. So far, the features of both are identical. I believe NGINX has more features for securing these services, but in terms of load balancing, both are massive solutions."
"The runtime environment for ASP.NET needs improvement to make it more universal."
"In the next release, I am looking for more advanced technologies such as socket communication and enhanced features like realtime chat with the clients."
"The initial setup is complex."
"The pricing is a bit expensive."
"The product's price is an area of concern, making it an area where improvements are required."
"The integration capability of the product with AI is an area with certain shortcomings, where improvements are required."
"The solution is difficult to learn if someone is learning it for the first time."
"They should try to improve their Blazor WebAssembly."
"The solution needs to be easier to setup and deploy."
"NGINX Plus is moderately priced, but it could give better value for money."
"I would like the configuration process to be more simplified."
"It would be good if NGINX provided a graphical user interface."
"The user interface could be improved."
"The drawback is that you must obtain a license for everything."
"Lack of a feature to print data on the terminal for verification of network traffic during debugging and testing."
"The scaling should be built into the software rather than configured from an outside source."
Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 4th in Application Infrastructure with 47 reviews while NGINX Plus is ranked 2nd in Application Infrastructure with 28 reviews. Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.4, while NGINX Plus is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Intuitive, easier to develop, maintain, and migrate from the old framework to newer versions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NGINX Plus writes "Quick installation and very easy to manage while doing orchestration or automation". Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with IIS, Magic xpa Application Platform, JBoss Enterprise Application Platform, Apache Web Server and Oracle SOA Suite, whereas NGINX Plus is most compared with IIS, HAProxy, Kemp LoadMaster and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM). See our Microsoft .NET Framework vs. NGINX Plus report.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.