We performed a comparison between Microsoft Power Apps and Pillir based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is very easy for us to implement. We have a Microsoft ecosystem, and this solution has many components for integration."
"The flows are good because they can be used in a variety of situations."
"Overall the solution is reliable."
"In Microsoft PowerApps the most valuable features are the fully customizable design that we can control everything that we would like to control. For example, the integration between Microsoft and third-party services through pre-built connectors, and the functionality to create custom connectors."
"When compared with Microsoft Power Automate, it is a bit more mature, and we're able to build things pretty rapidly."
"The most valuable features are low-code and fast development."
"The solution is very straightforward. Its context is obvious and everything is easy to understand."
"Time to market is most valuable because you can make apps pretty fast. It also has pretty good integration."
"I love how they took the MIT Scratch concept and implemented it into the in-app backend. It makes the app creation so much more intuitive and easy to use."
"I believe that this is the only product in the market that truly supports offline capabilities in an SAP environment."
"The connectors are the main components that reference the data sources, and these need to be improved."
"Customization is somewhat complicated."
"Customer support needs improvement."
"I would like to have more options for changing the layout because customizing something as simple as colors is very hard."
"When we talk of integrating with external applications, that's one area where, even today, I had to loop in my code developers. If this area can be streamlined so that my techno-functional consultants, who are on-site, can immediately start working on something without the assistance of developers, that would be ideal."
"The documentation isn't great. It's only 75% of what you need to know. If you go beyond that and run into issues, it's really not going to help you."
"Its user interface can be better. It is good, but it can be a bit clunky."
"This tool doesn't have an internal database. It only relies on the data layer of Microsoft Cloud."
"While we're not in a place of letting LOB analysts build apps, at some point, we may want to give them a bit more freedom - as long as we can limit their ability to harm the ERP data. I would like to see more tools pertaining to this area."
"The modernizer element should convert a higher percentage of the ABAP code, moving it from approximately 75%, closer to 100%."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Rapid Application Development Software with 77 reviews while Pillir is ranked 42nd in Rapid Application Development Software. Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8, while Pillir is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pillir writes "Helpful dashboard, supports offline capabilities for SAP, professional support, and a simple pricing model". Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Mendix, ServiceNow, Appian and Microsoft Azure App Service, whereas Pillir is most compared with . See our Microsoft Power Apps vs. Pillir report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.