We performed a comparison between Microsoft Power Apps and Studio Creatio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Power Automate has been the most valuable feature."
"Time to market is most valuable because you can make apps pretty fast. It also has pretty good integration."
"It is easy to use."
"The initial setup was very easy."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft PowerApps is the user interface."
"Creating a PowerApp is very easy. All I do is link and share the result with my colleagues. Deployment is very fast."
"The solution is easy to use and map."
"It's a very workable solution because it's an automated way of making applications. You have a template, you have the application know-how,"
"It is a low-code platform, that is very intuitive."
"The business process management is definitely the most valuable feature. What Creatio ended up doing with their software solution is giving you the power, in your own hands, in a way that is incredibly intuitive and well-structured."
"The pre-configured CRM functionalities regarding the accounts management and contact activities is very good. It's easy to develop workflows."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its CRM functionality and the fact that it is a no-code solution"
"The low-code tools and business process management that Creatio provides are useful for our internal processes. It is also very easy to use."
"The most valuable features are performance, built-in variety of multiple task automation, and has international standards notations."
"Studio Creatio is a very good and complete solution. It is very stable, and for customers who need a good response time, in the public cloud, Creatio provides the possibility to have a private server for a high level of transactions and good response time. Their support is great. They are very good, and they know the solution very well. Their response time is also great."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is its simplicity."
"As far as dealing with SharePoint, it'll allow you to ha manage up to 2000 rows, however, performance-wise, they're recommending that you just keep it at the default of 500 rows."
"The fact that we couldn't share that with our other organization or outside of the organization, consisting of our colleagues in the joint ventures, was a weakness of the solution."
"Microsoft PowerApps could improve the speed of Power Automate, it is not very fast."
"This tool doesn't have an internal database. It only relies on the data layer of Microsoft Cloud."
"Microsoft PowerApps is not responsive in nature."
"The portal and canvas apps need to be improved and brought up to speed."
"We would like to see some improvement in the cost of the solution when an organization has a more complex network structure. The advanced connectors are very expensive, which discourages our customers from implementing it."
"The pricing structure needs to be improved, the current information is confusing."
"Creatio needs to stabilize their marketplace."
"The mobile version of the solution could be improved. It's hard to customize it."
"Studio Creatio is a new product in the market, making its lack of maturity an area of concern."
"The way bpm's infrastructure works, you can only have one data source on a page. It has to be connected to the object and you're pretty much locked in at that point... If you want to connect anything other than what exists in that object to that object, you're going to have to create a completely new home for it in that object."
"Numerous options can make implementation confusing."
"It appears that at times, our partners might be using Google Translate, resulting in translations lacking context and not being entirely understandable."
"They can improve the business rules for defining the type and quantity of the business load. They already seem to be working on this improvement. Integration with the social networks will be very appreciated by the companies. It will be very useful for communication between the company and customers, that is, B to C relationships. Most of the customers or users have smartphones, and they use a lot of social networks. Companies need to stay connected with the customers. They have enabled integration with WhatsApp and Telegram in recent releases, which has been very useful."
"It does not have the ability to run one single large process."
Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Rapid Application Development Software with 78 reviews while Studio Creatio is ranked 23rd in Rapid Application Development Software with 12 reviews. Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8, while Studio Creatio is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Studio Creatio writes "Leveraging process automation and advanced tools for streamlined operations". Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Mendix, ServiceNow, Appian and Microsoft Azure App Service, whereas Studio Creatio is most compared with Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service, Mendix, OutSystems, Bizagi and Camunda. See our Microsoft Power Apps vs. Studio Creatio report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.