We performed a comparison between Mist AI and Cloud and Mojo Networks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless LAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) is the ability to troubleshoot ports on the network. Additionally, when there is an update on the APs they are able to reboot quickly reducing downtime. Other solutions have a longer downtime when updates are done."
"It provides private network access, helping us protect our company’s devices."
"The artificial intelligence feature is very good."
"The simplicity is great."
"Juniper Mist offers valuable features like comprehensive network insight, granular policy control, fast device setup, strong security, and efficient SSL traffic management."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Mist is the Virtual Network Assistant, powered by artificial intelligence."
"The solution is stable."
"AI-driven automation helps implement the solution quickly."
"Regarding features, the solution seems to be very intuitive."
"The Marvis feature of Mist AI, an artificial intelligence tool, is very useful."
"The triangulation feature can be used to determine where a person is in relation to the access point."
"The AI deployment process involves adding access points and placing them in the designated area. The AI system automatically adjusts channel selection and transmission power without any issues with stability or throughput. It has improved network performance."
"The most useful aspect of Mist AI and Cloud is automation capabilities."
"Has an extremely good feature set."
"Multi PSK (Pre-shared Key) is a very good feature in the solution...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Mojo Networks (Arista WiFi) is extremely secure with WIPS, built-in wireless."
"The initial setup was easy."
"It has given us a huge leg-up when competing with other managed service providers who use different vendors because of the visibility it gives us to customers' traffic for troubleshooting purposes."
"The stability of the solution has been good. We haven't had any issues."
"The security is a valuable feature."
"The configuration is simple and the reports can be automated."
"It is a hundred percent scalable product since its functionalities are good...It is a very stable product."
"We can see what the network is being used for or where problems may be."
"The pricing should be made cheaper."
"There is room for improvement in terms of support and installation."
"Enrolling into the tool is a tedious process."
"The solution is expensive."
"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."
"Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points’ support services need improvement."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"It would be helpful to have even stronger security features to help protect against interference from other nearby access points that aren't part of our network."
"Sometimes it takes a lot of time for the access point to connect with the cloud."
"There seems to be different versions of standards used in the wireless access points. In the future, it would be helpful if the solution could come up with some kind of universal standard for all devices and all access points."
"The solution lacks documentation."
"The solution has various licensing policies. It will be easy to use if it is an open single license."
"There are some technical issues that may require attention"
"It would be beneficial to have support for the Chinese language."
"If there's one thing I'd like to change, it's the pricing. They are quite expensive, but honestly, it's justified by the value they provide. However, for a simple Wi-Fi connectivity with basic security needs, there are alternatives in the market that offer comparable features at a more budget-friendly price."
"There is no local support for Mist in Brazil."
"Further expanding the API and access to even more diagnostics, as I have found a few limitations when I am dealing with them right now."
"I would like to have a single pane of glass to better control the access point and the switching."
"My only complaint about this product is its availability. Not many people can stock it and ordering from overseas is a challenge."
"Compared to other OEMs, Mojo Networks or Arista faces a little bit of coverage issues. So, if we put the same dBm, the power of the other OEMs indicates much more extensive coverage compared to Mojo or Arista."
"The solution is a bit pricier than Cisco."
"The renewal costs that come with it are very expensive."
"The distribution can be improved, particularly in this part of the world."
"Something that could be improved is the ability to easily and quickly see what speed someone is on and if there are any issues on the network. We are using the older software technology, so maybe their newest version is able to do that."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Mist AI and Cloud is ranked 7th in Wireless LAN with 21 reviews while Mojo Networks is ranked 23rd in Wireless LAN with 17 reviews. Mist AI and Cloud is rated 7.6, while Mojo Networks is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Mist AI and Cloud writes "A combination of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data science techniques to optimize user experiences". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mojo Networks writes "The product is easy to deploy since it can be done seamlessly with zero testing ". Mist AI and Cloud is most compared with Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless, ExtremeCloud IQ and Marvis Virtual Network Assistant, whereas Mojo Networks is most compared with Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Aruba Wireless and Cisco Wireless. See our Mist AI and Cloud vs. Mojo Networks report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
