We performed a comparison between MongoDB and Neo4j Graph Database based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases."We haven't had any issues with stability."
"The Dynamic Application is a valuable feature."
"MongoDB's best features are scalability, document management, and data security."
"MongoDB has a simple data-loading interface."
"It is convenient to use because we can do manipulations with the JSON data that we get. There are also a lot of joins and associations with MongoDB, which makes it easy to use for us."
"It's easy to add and remove things in MongoDB. You can alter the tables. MongoDB is faster at reading, slower at writings."
"The solution has good flexibility and very fast performance for searching data."
"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...Overall, MongoDB has helped manage and analyze attachment data."
"Creates the ability to visualize outputs."
"Enables people to understand what the business problem is and how the technology helps."
"As a graph database, I am surprised at their performance and response time."
"The MongoDB documentation can be a little complicated sometimes."
"It could be much more flexible like SequoiaDB. I would like to see more flexibility in the next release, especially when working with Microsoft Windows. A lot of people struggle with MongoDB because of their Windows versions. But Linux is faultless and mostly runs nicely."
"It is important to note that MongoDB has limitations since it can only be used for specific use cases. For example, for master data, I would want to pick keys using an RDBMS, but for attachments, I would choose MongoDB."
"MongoDB could improve by not having so many updates and different versions."
"The performance of the solution could be improved."
"The performance can be improved."
"I don't see a lot of areas that need improvement."
"I would like to see the scalability and security improved."
"So far, we have not had any issues and are happy with the product in general."
"There are concerns about performance and whether the tool can necessarily scale to provide the solution."
MongoDB is ranked 1st in NoSQL Databases with 70 reviews while Neo4j Graph Database is ranked 7th in NoSQL Databases with 3 reviews. MongoDB is rated 8.2, while Neo4j Graph Database is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of MongoDB writes "Lightweight with good flexibility and very fast performance for searching data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Neo4j Graph Database writes "Lots of training and documentation and excellent performance". MongoDB is most compared with InfluxDB, Couchbase, ScyllaDB, Cassandra and Aerospike Database 7, whereas Neo4j Graph Database is most compared with Cassandra, SingleStore, ScyllaDB, Accumulo and InfluxDB.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.