We performed a comparison between Mule Anypoint Platform and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."When we talk about the APIs, there are multiple policies one can apply on APIs, like rate limiting policies, OWASP policies, and OWASP security policies, that can be easily configured in Mule Anypoint Platform."
"The most valuable features of the Mule Anypoint Platform are the Flex Gateway, API management, easy-to-use, and connectors. Additionally, they are coming out with improvements to the solution when required."
"The tool is very capable and offers a high performance. The tool supports batch processing and ETL processing."
"This is the easiest and best tool available."
"It is a stable product...The initial setup was simple."
"The exchange and API management features are the best in the market."
"The community manager is the standout feature of the Mule Anypoint Platform, as it provides a platform to showcase your API to external parties. It is exceptionally user-friendly and enables external parties to easily utilize and consume the APIs."
"The initial setup is quite easy because the solution has a good interface through which the configuration, mapping, and so on can be done."
"I like that Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) has a straightforward setup and offers good technical support."
"The scalability is great. It's one of the reasons we chose the solution."
"The product has an ELT approach."
"Easy to understand, very developer-friendly, and has a big forum community and lots of documentation for support."
"The most valuable features of ODI are the knowledge modules, such as the Loading Knowledge module and the Check Knowledge module, they are helpful. We can check for the constraints in ODI. That helps in figuring out what are the constraints that are the primary keys created in the tables. We can check them with the Check Knowledge module."
"ODI significantly improves data integration and management by allowing customization of data types from various sources like SQL Server databases."
"What I found most valuable in Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is that it integrates well with almost all technologies currently being used in my company."
"Most of the functions are very straightforward, like the data model, mapping, package, and load plan. Thus, a new user could get started very fast."
"Its documentation needed a little bit of work to make it more usable. It is a platform that is used mainly by developers and other people for connecting systems. Its documentation was confusing in some areas and was not very helpful in other areas. I had to go to a consultant to get some work done, which ideally shouldn't be required."
"Mule should have better B2B integration."
"What I hear from my customers is that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites. The cost keeps increasing. MuleSoft should come up with customization factors by using a different way of getting the cost-related stuff to attract customers. That is, they should come up with some cost optimizations."
"There is not much information on the internet...The transforming message is an area in the solution that needs to be improved."
"The runtime management and connectors could use some work and are vulnerable to breakage after upgrades."
"Code quality, Code Security, SaaS, and DaaS security, can all be improved."
"Adding connectors for new upcoming applications would add extra value to this product."
"It would be better if we had a clearer view of the solution's future releases."
"Oracle support services are not up to the mark."
"ODI could improve the ease of use. There is a steep learning curve to use the solution."
"I rate it a seven out of 10 because there is room for growth because ODI is still new, in comparison to Informatica, which is a mature product."
"At present, when multiple steps are executed in parallel in the load plan and errors occur, the error handling mechanism does not function correctly."
"If you have something like Cisco on top of it, you will have endless problems."
"Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is already good as a solution. Still, it needs some editing of its preview package, or if the package is upgraded, that will make Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) even better."
"ODI could improve by being more user-friendly. Informatica, which is also an ETL tool, similar to ODI, but Informatica is very user-friendly, easy to use, and simple to integrate, compared to ODI. ODI has many features, put them all together, and sometimes we get confused about which ones to use, which ones not to use."
"It lacks a suite of tools suitable for fully processing data and moving it into decision support warehouses."
Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 3rd in Cloud Data Integration with 41 reviews while Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is ranked 4th in Data Integration with 68 reviews. Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2, while Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) writes "Straightforward to implement, scalable, and has good stability and documentation, but technical support could still be improved". Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration and SAP Cloud Platform, whereas Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is most compared with Oracle Integration Cloud Service, Informatica PowerCenter, SSIS, Azure Data Factory and Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics. See our Mule Anypoint Platform vs. Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
