We performed a comparison between Neo4j Graph Database and SQL Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases."Enables people to understand what the business problem is and how the technology helps."
"Creates the ability to visualize outputs."
"As a graph database, I am surprised at their performance and response time."
"It is easy to use and easy to perform a backup."
"The Always On tool improves the SQL server availability."
"Agent service is a good feature of SQL Server, where you can schedule certain tasks."
"The product is easy to use."
"SSAS is the most interesting feature to organize the data and let the users play with it."
"We have found there are many useful features such as the solution is continually being upgraded, ETL capabilities for extracting and transformation, and it is very easy to use."
"The solution is easy to use and provides similar features to other competitors."
"There was an online system in which we had about 2500 requests to the DB per second. Every request had a completion window of one second to process and retrieve data. After switching to SQL Server, and AlwaysOn, and Snapshot, and tinkering, and configuring and tinkering, the handling capacity we measured increased to about 5000 requests per second, while the time decreased to 0.5 seconds per request."
"There are concerns about performance and whether the tool can necessarily scale to provide the solution."
"So far, we have not had any issues and are happy with the product in general."
"It is very costly, and that's the reason people are moving away from SQL Server."
"The integration could be better. They are not open-source, so the integration with other platforms is not that easy."
"There is room for improvement in terms of pricing for SQL Server."
"We have had problems implementing a data warehouse using SQL Server."
"Improvements to the indexing, columnstore indexing, and high availability groups are good improvements for future versions."
"The interface integration could be better."
"In the next releases, I would only like more enhanced backups and more restore points."
"Linux-based editions are not yet proven to be on par with Windows deployments."
Neo4j Graph Database is ranked 7th in NoSQL Databases with 3 reviews while SQL Server is ranked 1st in Relational Databases Tools with 260 reviews. Neo4j Graph Database is rated 8.4, while SQL Server is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Neo4j Graph Database writes "Lots of training and documentation and excellent performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SQL Server writes "Easy to use and provides good speed and data recovery". Neo4j Graph Database is most compared with MongoDB, Cassandra, SingleStore and ScyllaDB, whereas SQL Server is most compared with MariaDB, SAP HANA, Oracle Database, LocalDB and IBM Db2 Database.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.