We performed a comparison between Nutanix AHV Virtualization and Odin Virtuozzo Containers based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Proxmox, VMware, Microsoft and others in Server Virtualization Software."Nutanix AHV Virtualization has good performance and can be used for backup and disaster."
"The most valuable feature of Nutanix AHV is that it can be managed through Hyper-V, which is Microsoft's hypervisor, VMware, and Citrix XenServer."
"The storage features and volume system are great."
"This solution is very stable and it has been running for the last three months, with no issues."
"It has a vs switch for the people who know Linux, in case it's easier for them to use AHV than it is to use VMware."
"The setup is efficient."
"The solution is user-friendly and provides good virtual machine backups. The user interface gets updated when there is a new release."
"The interface is very good, and quite user-friendly."
"When you run templates on the containers on Virtuozzo they have a lot of back-ups."
"A lot of tasks cannot be performed using the GUI, the graphical interface."
"The solution can be pricey."
"There are times when consultants, construction, or building firms need to use Beam but it can be difficult."
"If we have to opt for a high level of capacity planning and need more analytics—like deciding on new purchases or budgeting, or if we need additional resources in the near future—we need to pay for Prism Central. I would suggest that Nutanix improve a bit on the analytics part of Prism Element so we can calculate those kinds of things within that flavor."
"The integration capabilities of Nutanix AHV Virtualization is an area with certain shortcomings that need improvement."
"Some companies do not support AHV."
"Although AHV has many advantages, some drawbacks need to be mentioned. Compared to established hypervisors like VMware ESXi or Microsoft Hyper-V, AHV has a limited ecosystem and smaller community support."
"When we need to share, publish, or encrypt something, we still need to perform it using the command line."
"Odin Virtuozzo has poor support and needs to improve."
Nutanix AHV Virtualization is ranked 6th in Server Virtualization Software with 46 reviews while Odin Virtuozzo Containers is ranked 12th in Server Virtualization Software with 2 reviews. Nutanix AHV Virtualization is rated 8.6, while Odin Virtuozzo Containers is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Nutanix AHV Virtualization writes "Lightweight, integrates well, and the technical support is responsive". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Odin Virtuozzo Containers writes "Significant backup for containers, but the customer service is terrible". Nutanix AHV Virtualization is most compared with Proxmox VE, Hyper-V, VMware vSphere, KVM and Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI), whereas Odin Virtuozzo Containers is most compared with Proxmox VE, Hyper-V, KVM and VMware vSphere.
See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
