We performed a comparison between Nutanix AHV Virtualization and RHEV based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Server Virtualization Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Nutanix AHV Virtualization has good performance and can be used for backup and disaster."
"If we want to move the virtual machine from one host to another, it's simple, straightforward, and stable."
"The initial setup of Nutanix AHV Virtualization is straightforward."
"It has a vs switch for the people who know Linux, in case it's easier for them to use AHV than it is to use VMware."
"You don't need any other instruments for control, AHV. You only need to look at the prism to control all infrastructure."
"It is a stable solution. I haven't faced stability issues in the solution."
"The setup is efficient."
"The most valuable part of Nutanix is its centralized management of everything."
"I can control and manage everything. I know everything that's cooking inside. This is the best part for me."
"One of the most valuable features of this solution is the popularity of the OS."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"This solution is very stable. Much more so than similar products."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The price is the solution's most valuable aspect. It's much cheaper than, for example, VMware."
"RHEV’s cost is much less compared to VMware."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the support portal."
"They need to work on the deployment of virtual machines. They need to streamline the process of templates and deploying virtual machines."
"The price of Nutanix AHV Virtualization could improve."
"Some companies do not support AHV."
"It would be better if the solution's replication to another site could be efficiently optimized."
"The management console needs to improve to make it easier for administrators. For example, to be able to reorganize our VMs, folders, and subfolders, similarly as it is provided in VMware. We can sort, manage, and organize VMs, folders, or subfolders in VMware."
"The software based controller has high consumption. This could be improved."
"The solution could improve the call logging system to HPE, it is a bit tedious."
"Nutanix misses alerts sometimes."
"It would be better to have more patches, especially kernel-level updates, live and online so that we can keep the business up and running during this period."
"The biggest improvement would be more third-party direct support for things like backups and provisioning through third-party portals."
"The support is tricky in a few places. We're facing some challenges within Malaysia where we don't really have the system integrators available who can provide extended support. When we need personnel on-site, we can't get them."
"With RHEV, the cyberattacks should be fewer. I want RHEV to be better protected."
"Customers are not aware of this solution, they can improve by providing more awareness and solution availability."
"We'd like it if it would be possible on Red Hat Virtualization to possibly connect two or three VMs to the same disk."
"Configuring the network interfaces is much better in Ubuntu and should be improved."
"While everything needs improvement in some way, I have no specifics."
Nutanix AHV Virtualization is ranked 6th in Server Virtualization Software with 45 reviews while RHEV is ranked 10th in Server Virtualization Software with 32 reviews. Nutanix AHV Virtualization is rated 8.6, while RHEV is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Nutanix AHV Virtualization writes "Lightweight, integrates well, and the technical support is responsive". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RHEV writes "Offers frameworks with well-documented API and easy to use". Nutanix AHV Virtualization is most compared with Proxmox VE, Hyper-V, VMware vSphere, KVM and Oracle VM VirtualBox, whereas RHEV is most compared with VMware vSphere, KVM, Proxmox VE, Hyper-V and Oracle VM VirtualBox. See our Nutanix AHV Virtualization vs. RHEV report.
See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
