We performed a comparison between Proxmox VE and RHEV based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Server Virtualization Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is easy to deploy."
"The most valuable feature of Proxmox VE is its storage."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of deployment."
"You can easily migrate VMs between hosts."
"Proxmox VE has many containers. You need to download the image and do basic configuration, after which it is operational within a few minutes. The solution provides many containers that are light in use and don't use a lot of memory. You don't have to spend a lot of resources."
"The most valuable feature of Proxmox VE is its ease of use."
"The solution is stable."
"Proxmox VE is very lightweight, and it doesn't take a lot of memory on the device."
"The price is the solution's most valuable aspect. It's much cheaper than, for example, VMware."
"The most valuable feature of Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization is its pricing."
"RHEV’s cost is much less compared to VMware."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The most valuable features of RHEV are all the tools, such as virtualization, management of cloud platforms, and integration of container environments. The solution has good compatibility between virtualization, content management, and cloud management. Having the full set of these tools is the advantage of it."
"We find the ease of use of this solution to be invaluable. It is user-friendly and integrates well with other software."
"This solution is very stable. Much more so than similar products."
"Proxmox VE needs to make a deal with Veeam. I was also unable to make version upgrades. I have also encountered backup problems."
"The solution needs to move to the cloud. It would be nice if they made it more robust there."
"This solution needs a more flexible and efficient backup solution in the dashboard."
"Its performance and support can be improved. Currently, there is a cost for support."
"Proxmox VE doesn't offer a good interface for monitoring."
"It might be interesting to have the ability to integrate with other cloud solutions."
"I can't speak to any improvements. It is not lacking features."
"The virtualizer in Proxmox VE could improve."
"The solution could use network virtualization."
"There is not any proper documentation on the site to reference."
"The Administration of the Oracle database and the SAP ERP needs improvement."
"This solution could be more secure."
"The support is tricky in a few places. We're facing some challenges within Malaysia where we don't really have the system integrators available who can provide extended support. When we need personnel on-site, we can't get them."
"RHEV can improve by keeping pace with new features and new enhancements. They should not be halted or delayed innovation because over the past quarter the enhancements have not been as fast as they have been previously."
"When we do a direct comparison, then obviously VMware does better in terms of having Fault Tolerance and doing active disaster recovery and these kind of things. This is something that can be improved within Red Hat."
"Customers are not aware of this solution, they can improve by providing more awareness and solution availability."
Proxmox VE is ranked 1st in Server Virtualization Software with 58 reviews while RHEV is ranked 10th in Server Virtualization Software with 32 reviews. Proxmox VE is rated 8.6, while RHEV is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Proxmox VE writes "Easy to use and supports multi-monitors on multiple VMs in KVM". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RHEV writes "Offers frameworks with well-documented API and easy to use". Proxmox VE is most compared with VMware vSphere, Oracle VM VirtualBox, KVM, Nutanix AHV Virtualization and OpenVZ, whereas RHEV is most compared with VMware vSphere, KVM, Hyper-V, Oracle VM and Nutanix AHV Virtualization. See our Proxmox VE vs. RHEV report.
See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.