We performed a comparison between OpenText Silk Performer and Tricentis NeoLoad based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Tricentis, OpenText and others in Load Testing Tools."A good monitoring tool, simple to script and easy to configure."
"Very easy to use the front end and the UI is very good."
"The solution's setup was straightforward."
"The Frameworks feature is valuable. NeoLoad Web and the API are also valuable. It provides API support."
"Learning-wise, it's pretty straightforward and flexible because if the person has little knowledge of performance testing and the process, they can definitely easily grab the knowledge from NeoLoad."
"The most useful aspect of Tricentis NeoLoad was for the web."
"It offered us an easy to use, limited code option for end-to-end performance testing."
"I like the solution’s performance and integration. Also, the tool’s help center is very responsive and helpful. They have always helped me within a short duration of time."
"There aren't other solutions as competitive as Tricentis NeoLoad when it comes to the performance side."
"If you have a large amount of data, the solution can struggle."
"An area for improvement in Tricentis NeoLoad is its integration with third-party tools because, at the moment, it's a bit complicated. Per Tricentis, you can integrate Tricentis NeoLoad with different monitoring tools such as Dynatrace and New Relic, but that requires installing an additional tool to make that integration happen, rather than being able to pull in Tricentis NeoLoad from the different tools and servers, and make integration simpler and easier."
"The product is expensive."
"There is room for improvement with the support and community documentation as it can be difficult to find answers to questions quickly."
"I would like to see support for auto-correlations."
"Tricentis NeoLoad crashes if an application contains more than 1,000 scripts."
"It would be good to make some updates on the reporting side."
"Most people focus on HTTPS or TCP, but it would be good to have support for a variety of different protocols."
"It is easier to comprehend the analysis on its on-premise setup but not on its on-cloud setup."
OpenText Silk Performer is ranked 11th in Load Testing Tools with 1 review while Tricentis NeoLoad is ranked 2nd in Load Testing Tools with 62 reviews. OpenText Silk Performer is rated 8.0, while Tricentis NeoLoad is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of OpenText Silk Performer writes "Scripting and basic test executions are good features; configuring the workload for tests is easy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis NeoLoad writes " Maintenance will be easy, pretty straightforward to learn and flexible". OpenText Silk Performer is most compared with Apache JMeter and OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise, whereas Tricentis NeoLoad is most compared with Apache JMeter, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, Tricentis Tosca and BlazeMeter.
See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.