We performed a comparison between Opinnate and Tufin Orchestration Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Firewall Security Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Version upgrades can be done quickly."
"The platform is easy to deploy and maintain."
"It is an important application for controlling and monitoring firewall rules. It is useful for making and monitoring the changes."
"One of the things that came up this week was the ability to decommission a server, which we thought was interesting. We had a workshop recently that talked about all the things that need to be thought about when managing firewalls. People said, "A lot of times, things get forgotten when you are decommissioning a server." E.g., making sure rules are taken away and taking out the rule set. The fact that there is an automated workload for that can be helpful."
"Its ability to detect changes within our firewall."
"We find it to be flexible. If we have a change that needs to be done, it will go ahead and do it for all our devices, regardless of the manufacturer that we have associated with it."
"Tufin allows our say junior guys to learn how to view policies. It gives them a tool that will help them consolidate and optimize."
"I like the deployment and management of this solution."
"The most valuable features are the Security Risks and Best Practices reporting/Rule base cleanup."
"Comparing the rules and policy browser is valuable to me. It gives me the ability to pull running configs and be able to analyze them without having to go directly into the firewall."
"PDF format is not available for Alert Composer."
"The product's web page view is very basic. They could add new features to it."
"We want to have the ability for a ticket requester to add somebody, or to give somebody view rights to their ticket."
"It would be better if they modernized the web GUI. The web interface GUI is simple and not complicated, but it's also too old."
"We would like to see automation metrics, from a reporting standpoint. We would also like to see automation of site-to-site VPN tunnels. We would like to see automation of Check Point application-based firewall rules."
"The documentation site is horrible as well. It has a tree structure, and you really get lost quite easily."
"At least in our environment, the dynamic learning of the topology needs improvement."
"The network part of the solution could be improved. It's too hard because of the Tufin licensing model for the routing devices."
"A big improvement would be on the USP policy. If we could use Palo Alto to take those zone names and auto import them into the policy, then just do the policy based on the zone names instead of having to put in every single subnet."
"Our project is running on Riverbed for SDN. I don't know if Tufin can integrate with Riverbed. Other than that, I have no issues with this product."
Opinnate is ranked 12th in Firewall Security Management with 2 reviews while Tufin Orchestration Suite is ranked 2nd in Firewall Security Management with 180 reviews. Opinnate is rated 10.0, while Tufin Orchestration Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Opinnate writes "Good support, nice interface, and simple to upgrade". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tufin Orchestration Suite writes "A flexible, very secure solution that works well in Layer 2 environments". Opinnate is most compared with , whereas Tufin Orchestration Suite is most compared with AlgoSec, FireMon Security Manager, Skybox Security Suite, Palo Alto Networks Panorama and Illumio. See our Opinnate vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite report.
See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.
We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
