We performed a comparison between Oracle Autonomous Mobile Cloud Enterprise and Temenos Quantum based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Apple, Temenos and others in Mobile App Platforms."Oracle Autonomous Mobile Cloud Service helps us to deliver the application much more quickly, as it comes with built-in platform APIs for storage, push notifications, analytics, etc."
"You can do rapid development across multiple platforms."
"Its greatest advantage lies in its exceptional security and robustness."
"The main benefit lies in its exceptional speed of implementation."
"The best thing about Temenos Quantum is how it smoothly connects with Temenos Fabric. This simplifies our quantum application by handling identity, authentication, and security tasks seamlessly, saving us from extra coding."
"The best feature is the Kony Studio, which is the product that is used to develop interfaces."
"With the new VM releases, it is a faster product with more abilities that benefit the user."
"The most valuable feature is usability. You can develop components inside it and reuse them in different parts of your application, wherever needed. You can replicate them. There's also a Quantum Fabric on the back end, which provides a middle layer between your database and the third-party systems you need to integrate. It also provides the integration to handle all sorts of exceptions and timeouts on the Fabric. This makes it easy to troubleshoot errors coming from third-party APIs."
"Comparing other solutions with Temenos Quantum, the later is less mature and presents several issues. Implementing Temenos Quantum has been challenging, resembling a nightmare compared to the smoother experience with the other."
"One of the key areas in which MCS needs improvement is documentation. New features, like Zero Footprint SSO, need better documentation with detailed integration steps."
"The technology of the solution needs an update. It is deficient in terms of connectivity."
"One area where Temenos Quantum could improve is in the flexibility of widgets and additional libraries."
"The UI lacks flexibility, especially regarding customizations. There are numerous issues at the fabric end, and working with the visualizer is extremely challenging. Basic development tasks require a high-end machine, and even clicking on an icon initiates a thirty-second processing time. The challenges mainly revolve around fabric and content."
"There is definitely room for improvement, especially in the areas of AI, AR, and DR for mobile and web applications"
"They need to improve their tech support's abilities. They do have a good tech support, but it still requires improvement."
"Temenos Quantum is not quite stable yet."
"The security and the interface technology could be better in Temenos Quantum. Additionally, a module that can display all the activities that have been done in the system would be helpful."
"Some features are only enabled for paid users. It would be much better if they enabled those features without having to pay. I would also like to see them publish information about future technologies on the Home screen under a separate tab. That would be an improvement."
Earn 20 points
Oracle Autonomous Mobile Cloud Enterprise is ranked 8th in Mobile App Platforms while Temenos Quantum is ranked 3rd in Mobile App Platforms with 15 reviews. Oracle Autonomous Mobile Cloud Enterprise is rated 7.6, while Temenos Quantum is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Oracle Autonomous Mobile Cloud Enterprise writes "PaaS for SaaS: Development Tools in the Cloud". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Temenos Quantum writes "Though a secure tool for building applications, there is a need to improve its stability". Oracle Autonomous Mobile Cloud Enterprise is most compared with , whereas Temenos Quantum is most compared with OutSystems, Microsoft Azure App Service and ServiceNow.
See our list of best Mobile App Platforms vendors and best Mobile Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Mobile App Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.