We performed a comparison between Oracle Integration Cloud Service and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Oracle Integration Cloud Service is a really good product and the ROI is very good with it. It lowers development time. A development cycle that may have taken a year without Oracle Integration Cloud Service can drop down to three or four months with it."
"It's easy to build an integration and make changes to it."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of customization."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Integration Cloud Service is its ease of use. We do not depend on any tool to develop it. Everything is on the browser and is easy to integrate, even for someone who does not understand a lot about coding."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Integration Cloud Service is its performance."
"Technical support responds quickly."
"The OIC is very good."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service offers a lot of adaptors."
"I like the stability of the webMethods Integration Server."
"It's very flexible and a good platform to use."
"The product supports various types of digital documents, including XMLs and EDI."
"High throughput and excellent scalability."
"The main assets are its flow language, debugging, and Broker. Flow language is far better and more flexible for debugging."
"The solution's ease-of-use is its most valuable feature, in which complex issues may be resolved."
"Currently, we're using this solution for the integration server which helps us to integrate with the mainframe."
"Most of the work in our organization can be more easily done using the tool."
"The support and resources were lacking — they weren't there."
"In designer mode, sometimes the browser closure or other unknown issues can cause strange behavior, which requires a restart."
"The error retrying mechanism could be improved. If an error occurs, it can be retried automatically, it would be helpful."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service can improve the downloading and uploading of files. I've submitted this issue to the Oracle Idea Labs. The issue is from the front end of Oracle Integration Cloud, we cannot download or upload a file directly or drag and drop it."
"There are a few features that we noticed are not in the cloud. There are some improvements needed. One example is the graphical user interface that needs to improve, it could be easier to use."
"They should provide tutorials for beginners to learn about the processes."
"The solution is expensive."
"Sometimes, the tech support is slow to get back to us. We have had to wait up to two weeks for a response."
"The orchestration is not as good as it should be."
"We need more dashboards and reporting engines that can provide detailed information for management. In short, we need better analytics."
"It could be more user-friendly."
"In terms of scale, I would give it a four out of 10."
"In terms of improvement, it would be better if it adapted quicker to open standards. It took a while for API specification before the last version was available. The spec of version two was rather quick."
"As webMethods Integration Server is expensive, that's its area for improvement."
"I would like to have a dashboard where I can see all of the communication between components and the configuration."
"The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly."
More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Oracle Integration Cloud Service is ranked 3rd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 32 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. Oracle Integration Cloud Service is rated 8.0, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Oracle Integration Cloud Service writes "An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". Oracle Integration Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), AWS Glue, Mule Anypoint Platform, Oracle GoldenGate and Informatica PowerCenter, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Azure Data Factory. See our Oracle Integration Cloud Service vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.