We performed a comparison between Proofpoint Threat Response and ServiceNow Security Operations based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Security Incident Response solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Support is very responsive."
"The best part of Proofpoint Threat Response is the Auto-Pull feature. Being able to pull an email back from a user's mailbox is very useful, yet I have noticed that not a lot of organizations use this kind of feature."
"It has reduced our manual efforts to remove emails from each user's inbox, and in this case we do not have to ask our IT department or users to do so."
"My favorite feature is the application vulnerability scanner."
"ServiceNow Security Operations also takes care of GRC, governance, risk and compliance, enabling it to provide risk assessment."
"The most valuable aspect of working with ServiceNow is its meaningful and feature-rich product."
"The "follow" feature is really good. If the user is not responding, there's an option to "follow". Just click on the button, and it will automatically trigger an email to the end user."
"Reduces time to closure and closure metrics for vulnerabilities."
"The solution is available over the cloud and is easy to manage."
"We refer to the setup and installation guide provided by ServiceNow. They have good documentation, which makes it easier to handle the process."
"It gives you the ability to bring data into the system. The workflows are out of the box, and it gives you the ability to auto-assign the incidents based on criteria and vulnerabilities."
"The interface within Threat Response could be made simpler."
"If the reporting gets improved then it would be better, but the product is running amazing as it is."
"Has some quirks."
"It is challenging for the customers to understand the processes for SecOps. It needs to be simplified."
"It's very slow. When you click a button or update a field, it takes forever to actually react."
"The threat intelligence module needs a better dashboard."
"An area for improvement I observed in ServiceNow Security Operations is the need to maintain correct CMDB data because if you're unable to do this, you can't perfectly maintain the vulnerability data. CMDB data in ServiceNow Security Operations needs to be accurate. As I've been working on ServiceNow Security Operations for only seven months, I still need more time to try all its modules before I can give recommendations regarding additional features I'd like to see in the solution."
"Process framework and best practices for ease of integration between IT and security teams via incident, problem, and change."
"There is room for improvement in terms of developer support and documentation."
"It doesn't interact with things very well."
"The initial setup is difficult."
More ServiceNow Security Operations Pricing and Cost Advice →
Proofpoint Threat Response is ranked 5th in Security Incident Response with 3 reviews while ServiceNow Security Operations is ranked 3rd in Security Incident Response with 14 reviews. Proofpoint Threat Response is rated 8.4, while ServiceNow Security Operations is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Proofpoint Threat Response writes "Tracks and mitigates email security incidents with Auto-Pull, and has good stability and performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow Security Operations writes "Mature with nice UI and customizable workflows". Proofpoint Threat Response is most compared with Cofense Triage and Splunk SOAR, whereas ServiceNow Security Operations is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, IBM Resilient and Exabeam Fusion SIEM. See our Proofpoint Threat Response vs. ServiceNow Security Operations report.
See our list of best Security Incident Response vendors.
We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
