We performed a comparison between PRTG Network Monitor and Statseeker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"It is great for service level agreements and can comply fully with internet monitoring or any interface."
"The real-time monitoring feature in PRTG is invaluable to me"
"It is a very stable solution. There are no bugs, glitches and we have not experienced any crashing."
"The most valuable features of PRTG Network Monitor are user-friendly, and the graphical interface is good for all the network devices that are mapped in this organization. It's very easy to find reports for any devices that we are looking for."
"Technical support has been very helpful so far."
"It is easy when it comes to dependencies of devices, so if your router goes down, the three or four switches behind it will automatically be paused so that you don't get multiple alerts."
"The initial setup is pretty easy."
"The scalability is good. You can improve a remote host or the clustering. This gives it the flexibility to monitor another infrastructure remotely."
"Summary Reports provide a quick way to identify where potential issues are. Drill-downs provide more granular details very quickly."
"We're able to recover more expensive ports on our access line devices."
"Device grouping is very easy, and you can discover thousands of devices in a few minutes."
"The most important feature for us is the interface statistics, because our customer normally asks us for bandwidth utilization reports. Statseeker has very descriptive transmit and receive information."
"Key features for us are custom reporting, 95th Percentile, and trend lines."
"The most valuable features are scalability and reliability."
"Grouping, Threshold/alerts, Netflow analyser, Private MIB object support are most valuable as they can provide more visibility into network performance, and for network troubleshooting."
"The most valuable feature is the dashboard, where you have everything right there on the screen."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"The technical support service should be improved."
"Having a Unix implementation or Unix installation could be an improvement. Right now, it's based just on Windows, and that's a problem for some customers."
"PRTG Network Monitor could improve the price."
"There is room for improvement in this solution for the performance and third-party monitoring protocols. They need to be updated to the latest ones."
"The product could be improved by being cross-platform friendly."
"Improvements in data storage flexibility, such as allowing customers to specify data retention periods, would enhance PRTG."
"I would like to see network mapping."
"We're using more cloud services now. It would be useful to be able to get information back from these cloud services in detail, and display any issues within PRTG for the rest of our systems."
"Technical support for this solution is bad, as is everything with Cisco support."
"The interface could be more user-friendly and it would be nice if there were enhanced options for reporting."
"I would like to see more comprehensive reporting and alerting."
"The user interface needs to be made more intuitive."
"I'd say the interface could improve a little bit. I find with new users, I tend to have to spend a bit of time walking them through how to use the interface. It could be a little more user friendly."
"I would like to see the solution incorporate diagnosis of the workstation."
"If it had more detailed NetFlow information then it would be far better."
"I would like the ability to update the dashboard. I would also like the ability to access via an API. Then I could produce a dashboard that my C level can understand. This is just so they can go and refresh whenever they want to and see what things look like."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
PRTG Network Monitor is ranked 5th in Network Monitoring Software with 96 reviews while Statseeker is ranked 64th in Network Monitoring Software with 38 reviews. PRTG Network Monitor is rated 8.2, while Statseeker is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of PRTG Network Monitor writes "It's an all-in-one solution, and net flow is included in the licensing ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Statseeker writes "Simplifies monitoring and provides real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise". PRTG Network Monitor is most compared with Zabbix, Centreon, Nagios XI, SolarWinds NPM and ManageEngine OpManager, whereas Statseeker is most compared with Fortinet FortiSIEM. See our PRTG Network Monitor vs. Statseeker report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
