We performed a comparison between ReadyAPI and Tricentis NeoLoad based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Performance Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's easy to implement."
"The dashboards are very good and consolidate all of the tests that you are performing with the client."
"It's easy to automate for more data-driven testing."
"It's easy to learn how to use it."
"The most valuable features of ReadyAPI are its robust functionality and collaboration capabilities."
"The performance testing capabilities are very good."
"ReadyAPI's best features are that it's user-friendly and its behavior-driven development is flexible."
"It can create stress tests very fast, and some features help you do it fast."
"The most effective aspect is especially when I'm renaming all the scripting factors, basically the containers that I use."
"Learning-wise, it's pretty straightforward and flexible because if the person has little knowledge of performance testing and the process, they can definitely easily grab the knowledge from NeoLoad."
"The dashboards give extensive statistics, which help with quick report preparation and analysis."
"With the tool, it is possible to compare NeoLoad test results against baseline and benchmark, and we can make the comparisons in the same window."
"The licensing cost is very less for NeoLoad. It is user-friendly and easy to understand because they have created so many useful functionalities. When I started working with this tool, we just had to do the initial assessment about whether this tool will be able to support our daily work or not. I could easily understand it. I didn't have to search Google or watch YouTube videos. In just 15 to 20 minutes, I was able to understand the tool."
"I like the scripting and parameterization features."
"There aren't other solutions as competitive as Tricentis NeoLoad when it comes to the performance side."
"It helped in achieving the testing of on-premise applications, as well as cloud-based applications, without much difficulty."
"Lacking flexibility of adding more custom verification for security testing."
"I would like to see a better dashboard for monitoring in the next release of this solution."
"The reporting is not very robust and needs to be improved."
"The performance in some cases needs improvement. Sometimes it requires too many resources."
"Can be improved by including an inherent feature for UI automation."
"In terms of features, I have already raised different change requests on the ReadyAPI side. One of the largest functions I've requested is the validation of the payload for the REST APIs."
"The overall scope of this solution is limited and could be improved."
"I don't like how they don't have a clear way to manage tests between multiple projects."
"It is easier to comprehend the analysis on its on-premise setup but not on its on-cloud setup."
"Regular and strong support has to be made available by Tricentis during the solution's implementation and initial setup."
"NeoLoad does not support Citrix-based applications."
"The debugging part of Tricentis NeoLoad takes time."
"The product is expensive."
"The solution can be improved by introducing a secure testing feature."
"There is room for improvement with the support and community documentation as it can be difficult to find answers to questions quickly."
"The SAP area could be improved."
ReadyAPI is ranked 7th in Performance Testing Tools with 34 reviews while Tricentis NeoLoad is ranked 3rd in Performance Testing Tools with 61 reviews. ReadyAPI is rated 7.8, while Tricentis NeoLoad is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ReadyAPI writes "Allows you to parameterize in one place for the changes to reflect everywhere and lets you customize the environment, but its load testing feature needs improvement, and costs need to be cheaper". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis NeoLoad writes " Maintenance will be easy, pretty straightforward to learn and flexible". ReadyAPI is most compared with Apache JMeter, Katalon Studio, Tricentis Tosca, ReadyAPI Test and Selenium HQ, whereas Tricentis NeoLoad is most compared with Apache JMeter, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, Tricentis Tosca and Akamai CloudTest. See our ReadyAPI vs. Tricentis NeoLoad report.
See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.