We performed a comparison between SAP Data Services and webMethods.io Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The logic is also simple. It makes it easy to build your extraction."
"The product's most valuable features are data validation and rules."
"Data Services' best features are its robustness and plug-and-play integration with other SAP applications."
"The solution offers very good integration capabilities."
"The most valuable feature of SAP Data Services is the integration with data sources."
"The API tool in this product is very valuable; it is very easy to onboard and use."
"You can always manipulate a lot of things as long as you have the skill level."
"I have worked with Data Services for a long time, and currently, I find the dashboarding and reporting part to be the most valuable function."
"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."
"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."
"I like the tool's scalability."
"Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."
"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."
"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."
"The solution is scalable."
"There should be some kind of enhancement that can be done on the admin side of certain sites where we can assign the roles and responsibilities. We should be able to control who is using the tool and how."
"An area for improvement in SAP Data Services could involve making the product more accessible to non-technical end-users."
"It's an ETL that is very good with relational databases but not as good with files and semi-structured files."
"The initial setup is complex."
"The execution engines and processing engines have shortcomings and need improvements."
"The solution shows a lack of cloud support data services."
"It will work fine only in an SAP environment. It could be said that the integration with other vendors could be better."
"The solution should offer more machine learning and automation."
"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."
"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."
"It is difficult to maintain."
"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."
"The solution's release management feature could be better."
"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."
SAP Data Services is ranked 10th in Data Integration with 45 reviews while webMethods.io Integration is ranked 23rd in Cloud Data Integration with 7 reviews. SAP Data Services is rated 8.0, while webMethods.io Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of SAP Data Services writes "Responsive support, scalable, and beneficial integration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable". SAP Data Services is most compared with Azure Data Factory, Syniti Data Quality, Informatica PowerCenter, SAP Process Orchestration and Palantir Foundry, whereas webMethods.io Integration is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, SAP Cloud Platform, Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps. See our SAP Data Services vs. webMethods.io Integration report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.