We performed a comparison between SECDO Platform and VMware Carbon Black Endpoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Security Incident Response solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"This is stable and scalable."
"Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"The stability is very good."
"The ease of deployment and configuration is valuable. It's very easy compared to other vendors like Sophos. Sophos' configuration is complex. Fortinet is a lot easier to understand. You don't need a lot of admin knowledge to do the configuration."
"It is stable and scalable."
"The price is low and quite competitive with others."
"The ease of deployment is a valuable feature."
"Technical support is great. Palo Alto is extremely helpful and responsive."
"It basically automates the entire alert investigation process."
"The tool is pretty stable."
"The solution is very useful and easy to handle. You don't need much intervention with this product."
"It has intelligent learning behind it and we have been very successful in preventing attacks."
"The offline networking is the most important feature. Some of our users are engineers that work offsite, and they can still be on the solution, which is also great."
"I found it very valuable as a whole. It is good at detecting anything and has kept us very safe. It is also very easy to use."
"Carbon Black CB Defense has helped improve my organization by allowing us to have better data so that we can do correlation and get visibility into the alerts."
"The whole purpose of the product, like application control, is very good, and also if you need to update some policies, it works well and instantly."
"There's lots of very useful documentation online to help troubleshoot and learn about the product."
"We've had a lot of false positives; things incorrectly flagged that require manual configuration to allow. Even worse, after we allow a legitimate program, it sometimes gets flagged again after an update. This has caused a lot of extra work for my team."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"They can include the automation for the realtime updates. We have a network infrastructure with remote sites. Whenever they send updates, they are not automated. We have to go into the console and push those updates. I wish it was more automated. The update file is currently around 31 MB. It could be smaller."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"The amount of usage, the number of details we get, or the number of options that can be tweaked is limited in comparison to that with other EDR solutions"
"We'd like to see more one-to-one product presentations for the distribution channels."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"FortiEDR could add a separate scanning dashboard. In incident management, we prefer to remove the endpoint system from the environment and scan the system. We typically use Symantec for that, but if we want to use FortiEDR for that, then we need a scanning tab to clarify things."
"The price should be reduced in order to be more competitive in the market."
"Maybe the notifications setting could use a simpler setting."
"Many will try to use this as an out-of-the-box solution, however, it needs to be configured to fit what a company would like to do with it."
"The solution needs expanded endpoint query tools."
"The tech support communicates, but it's just not with movement."
"The local technical support is very poor, but the support from headquarters is very nice."
"I would like to see the user credentials feature improved. I would also like to see more reporting features and better ways to roll the reports out."
"What was rolled out to my company are mixed versions of Carbon Black CB Defense, so what I'd like to see in the next release is more synchronization, where it can detect the endpoint that's running an old version and suggest updates."
"CB Defense could be more compatible with Linux, and its cloud provision could be improved."
"The directions for Splunk are spot on, but it is difficult to find anything on integration with AlienVault,"
"The application control can be improved. It should also have an automatic update of the agents."
Earn 20 points
SECDO Platform is ranked 9th in Security Incident Response while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is ranked 1st in Security Incident Response with 61 reviews. SECDO Platform is rated 9.0, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of SECDO Platform writes "Great documentation, good technical support, and very in-depth". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Carbon Black Endpoint writes "Centralization via the cloud allows us to protect and control people working from home". SECDO Platform is most compared with Fortinet FortiSOAR and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trend Micro Deep Security, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks. See our SECDO Platform vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint report.
See our list of best Security Incident Response vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.