We compared Trend Micro Deep Security and VMware Carbon Black Endpoint based on our users reviews in five parameters. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Comparison Results: When comparing Trend Micro Deep Security and VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, it is generally believed that Deep Security has a simpler and more straightforward initial setup. Deep Security also offers a wider variety of deployment options and provides helpful documentation and video tutorials. Conversely, Carbon Black Endpoint's setup can be more difficult, requiring complex configurations and customized policies. However, Carbon Black Endpoint has advantageous features like MDR capability and a whitelisting process for protection against zero-day threats. Deep Security has a smaller impact on system resources and efficient threat detection, whereas Carbon Black Endpoint offers superior log analysis and continuous monitoring. Some customers find Deep Security's pricing to be high, while Carbon Black Endpoint is generally described as expensive. The quality of customer service for both products has received mixed reviews and has room for improvement.
"It's easy to use and the interface is simple."
"This product offers good protection against many types of malware."
"It provides a comprehensive feature set and a strong security baseline for us with integrations into other security tools."
"The solution is quite secure."
"DLP, Data Loss Prevention, and the complexity of how we manage the console and how this client, or this tool, will notify us when there is something going wrong within the server and endpoint, is good."
"We like the Smart protection and the Virtual patching."
"The most valuable features of the solution we have enabled in our organization are its anti-malware capabilities, applications, web reputation, and integrity monitoring."
"There is a degree of set it and forget it in regards to the actual endpoints and what you can do with the console, which is nice."
"This product has the capability of uploading scripts to the tool and this is a very comprehensive feature."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"It has intelligent learning behind it and we have been very successful in preventing attacks."
"Some of the valuable features I have found are the online documentation of the solution is well organized and thorough. I like the simplicity of bypass and the visualization of the active components."
"The product enables device controls, helping us protect the devices and prevent data leakages."
"We can access computers remotely if we need to."
"It uses machine learning and behavioral analytics for advanced threat detection and response."
"The new feature that we're deploying, the new offering from Carbon Black, is MDR, which stands for manage, detect, and response. It's the most valuable feature because Carbon Black will be continuously checking the logs, and they will be advising us on how to improve some of the policies as well as review the logs. If there are any nefarious agents or things happening on the end points, they will know."
"Deep Security's most valuable features are antivirus and host intrusion detection."
"The tool needs to improve its subscription."
"Enhancements in agent performance are needed, specifically in reducing server utilization during scanning."
"The price could be reduced."
"If I had more reporting, the product would be an A plus."
"The setup is fairly complex. The deployment took around two months."
"I would rate tech support in the range of six to eight out of 10. Time to provide solution could be improved."
"It should have XDR and EDR integration. It would be nice if they can tie it up with an XDR or EDR."
"The application control can be improved. It should also have an automatic update of the agents."
"Sensor deployment requires extensive fine-tuning, and creating deployment packages is time-consuming."
"In my company, we face issues sometimes when there is a need to write custom rules or we want to write for some rules that are different from the standard rules provided by the solution."
"But here, we hardly can take any kind of a report out of Carbon Black, so I think that should be something that should be more user-friendly."
"Needs improvement in the area of infrastructure for on-premise installation."
"Carbon Black has limited capability to integrate with Rapid7."
"In the past, we've seen some stability issues in the latest version releases. We tend to hang back one version just to make sure issues are fully resolved to avoid user disruption."
"Based on all the security roles and the release privilege, it could take time for an application to be whitelisted and approved for use."
Trend Micro Deep Security is ranked 1st in Virtualization Security with 81 reviews while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is ranked 16th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 61 reviews. Trend Micro Deep Security is rated 8.6, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Trend Micro Deep Security writes "High availability, effective VPM, and responsive support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Carbon Black Endpoint writes "Centralization via the cloud allows us to protect and control people working from home". Trend Micro Deep Security is most compared with Trend Micro Apex One, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Symantec Endpoint Security and Symantec Data Center Security, whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Symantec Endpoint Security and Trellix Endpoint Security.
We monitor all Virtualization Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
