We performed a comparison between SmartBear TestComplete and UiPath Test Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Test Automation Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."TestComplete fits almost perfectly with a large amount of stacks, such as Delphi, C#, Java and web applications."
"The product has many features."
"The initial setup is pretty easy and it's quick to deploy."
"Customer service and technical support responsiveness are high. Everyone is very professional."
"Recording and playback of tests were easier with SmartBear TestComplete...It is a scalable solution."
"The solution is mainly stable."
"It works very fine. It is fast on almost any machine, and it is also very well organized. I like its object mapping and its capability to find and interact with almost everything that exists on Windows."
"The most valuable features are the desktop and mobile modules."
"What I like most about UiPath Test Suite is that it's straightforward, and any user who knows how to use the UiPath Studio can learn how to create a test script in as fast as thirty minutes. There's nothing new you must learn to use UiPath Test Suite because it only has three sections: Given, Then, and When."
"Our team used to require five to six days to complete the entire release or execution cycle. Now, we're able to complete it within just one or one and a half days."
"UiPath's tools are generally designed for business users, so they can be as simple or as complex as needed."
"Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable."
"The console, in a single pane, allows us to understand where we are in the testing environment."
"It's effective at testing whatever automation we've built or making sure the automation we've built is working fine."
"UiPath's most valuable features are reusability and low-code aspects. It works across both desktop and web applications."
"The detailed logging is invaluable."
"In scenarios where two of our engineers work on the same task, merging codes is a bit difficult."
"The initial setup of SmartBear TestComplete was complex."
"The integration tools could be better."
"During the distribution of our regression test cases, the control IDs are not always recognized correctly."
"In the cross-browser domain, it has a few snags with Microsoft Edge and Chrome; although, these problems are not critical."
"TestComplete gives support to do requests to a SOAP web service but has no support to do HTTP requests on Restful services."
"The solution needs Mac OS support. Right now, the solution has only been developed to accommodate Windows OS."
"Product is not stable enough and it crashes often."
"UiPath needs to improve its Test Manager feature. Defect management and reporting also need improvement."
"UiPath could further enhance its functionality by simplifying the test case creation process within Test Suite."
"They could improve the visualization of the product."
"Storing the test scripts is what needs to improve in the UiPath Test Suite, as it's currently a challenge to some extent. Maintaining the files is a bit challenging, especially when you need to keep those locally."
"UiPath’s Test Suite manual testing doesn’t work for our organization based on how the QA Analysts do their manual testing and the artifacts that are needed for deployment."
"With Selenium, there is a plugin called Healenium, which helps automatically detect changed properties of objects. With one click, it automatically updates the object repository with the changed properties. I would like UiPath to add that capability."
"The reporting could be improved. Often, we need to email a report to higher management, we can directly get the report from there. Also, the error reporting could be better."
"We have output arguments in the workflow. We can check results only by using those arguments. It would be better to have some more options, such as screen variables. For example, in a workflow, if we want to check if an activity is present inside, we should be able to get the output to UiPath Test Suite through the activity itself. That would be great for testing."
SmartBear TestComplete is ranked 7th in Test Automation Tools with 72 reviews while UiPath Test Suite is ranked 6th in Test Automation Tools with 17 reviews. SmartBear TestComplete is rated 7.6, while UiPath Test Suite is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of SmartBear TestComplete writes "A stable product that needs to improve its integration capabilities with other test management tools". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath Test Suite writes "Can be used by non-developers, and saves us time, but the manual testing needs improvement". SmartBear TestComplete is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio, Ranorex Studio, OpenText UFT One and Appium, whereas UiPath Test Suite is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT One, froglogic Squish, Katalon Studio and Eggplant Test. See our SmartBear TestComplete vs. UiPath Test Suite report.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
