We performed a comparison between Katalon Studio and UiPath Test Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Test Automation Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup of Katalon Studio was easy."
"The product provides ease of automation for the cloud."
"Smart Wait and XPath healing are valuable features."
"Katalon Studio's biggest advantage is its price. It's a good tool for the price, albeit with some limitations when you compare it with tools like Tricentis Tosca."
"The ability to build all libraries with codes and use them in many situations has been most valuable."
"The tool is easy to use. The product gives me the flexibility to use Selenium. I can also use my Java capabilities in the solution."
"I rate Katalon Studio's scalability a four out of five."
"The most valuable feature is its automation security capabilities."
"We are finding bugs and defects much faster."
"We can generate our own workflow. In our case, it is a report on the PDF file. In the reporting category, we generally verify a couple of things and generate a lot of reports at the end of the day. It provides some useful details about the data captured from the PDF that we can put into an Excel file."
"UiPath's tools are generally designed for business users, so they can be as simple or as complex as needed."
"What I like most about UiPath Test Suite is that it's straightforward, and any user who knows how to use the UiPath Studio can learn how to create a test script in as fast as thirty minutes. There's nothing new you must learn to use UiPath Test Suite because it only has three sections: Given, Then, and When."
"The document understanding is good."
"It is a very scalable product."
"We also don't develop test robots like typing codes; we program them with drag-and-drop features."
"It's effective at testing whatever automation we've built or making sure the automation we've built is working fine."
"Its stability needs improvement."
"Katalon Studio's pricing is expensive."
"The Object Spy is rather frustrating to work with, so I tend not to use it."
"Katalon lacks integration with other software, including integrating other languages like .NET and PHP."
"During parallel execution, some reports are randomly switched."
"It would be helpful to have an automatic save feature."
"It seems to lack a few requirements that a typical customer would want. Compared to other solutions, this product is lacking."
"The integration process with Jira should be enhanced and facilitated."
"They could improve the visualization of the product."
"We have output arguments in the workflow. We can check results only by using those arguments. It would be better to have some more options, such as screen variables. For example, in a workflow, if we want to check if an activity is present inside, we should be able to get the output to UiPath Test Suite through the activity itself. That would be great for testing."
"Orchestrator is not easy to use or understand."
"We'd like to see the solution integrate with more code or local frameworks."
"UiPath’s Test Suite manual testing doesn’t work for our organization based on how the QA Analysts do their manual testing and the artifacts that are needed for deployment."
"The test manager component could be improved."
"UiPath needs to improve its Test Manager feature. Defect management and reporting also need improvement."
"At FORWARD VI, we see new automations being built around AI and the ability to have developers understand how they can drive some of those AI capabilities with Studio. We are starting to see that. They should also drive that with UiPath Test Suite so that we can not only build that development side faster; we can also develop the tests that go along with it, hopefully automatically."
Katalon Studio is ranked 3rd in Test Automation Tools with 42 reviews while UiPath Test Suite is ranked 6th in Test Automation Tools with 17 reviews. Katalon Studio is rated 7.8, while UiPath Test Suite is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Katalon Studio writes " Functional automation features and the recording functionality saves time but the performance and script execution is slow ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath Test Suite writes "Can be used by non-developers, and saves us time, but the manual testing needs improvement". Katalon Studio is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Postman, OpenText UFT One, Testim and Appium, whereas UiPath Test Suite is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT One, SmartBear TestComplete, froglogic Squish and Eggplant Test. See our Katalon Studio vs. UiPath Test Suite report.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.