We performed a comparison between SSIS and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Built in reports show package execution and messages. Logging can also be customized so only what is needed is logged. There is also an excellent logging replacement called BiXpress that provides both historical and real-time monitoring which is more efficient and much more robust than the built-in logging capabilities. And none of this requires custom coding to make it useful unlike many other ETL tools."
"It is easy to set up the solution."
"We like that this solution includes a developer edition, free of charge, to allow for training."
"It's saved time using visualization descriptions."
"The initial setup of this solution is very straightforward."
"It's already very user-friendly and has a good dashboard."
"SSIS integrates well with SQL servers and Microsoft products."
"The solution is stable."
"Operationally, I consider the solution to be quite good."
"The stability is good."
"Segregation of deployment for the environments is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"It’s fairly easy to view, move, and mange access across different components. Different component types are categorized and can be viewed in a web based administration console."
"The product is very stable."
"It integrates well with various servers."
"High throughput and excellent scalability."
"Broker and UM are the best features."
"The high prices attached to the product can be an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Improvement as per customer requirements."
"We'd like them to develop data exploration more."
"We've had issues in terms of the amount of data that is transferred when we are scheduling."
"Options for scaling could be improved."
"The solution could improve on integrating with other types of data sources."
"SSIS sometimes hangs, and there are some problems with servers going down after they've been patched."
"There were some issues when we tried to connect it to data storage. It was a connection issue."
"Support is expensive."
"The solution has big instances when deployed under microservices or in a containerized platform. They need to improve that so that it is competitive with other integration solutions, like Redis and Kafka. Deployments under microservices with those solutions are much more lightweight, in the size of the runtime itself, compared with Software AG."
"We got the product via a reseller, and the support from the reseller has been less than desirable."
"webMethods Integration Server needs to add more adapters."
"This product is for larger companies. Compared to TIBCO I think webMethods is better in terms of ease of use and support."
"The orchestration is not as good as it should be."
"The UI for the admin console is very old. It hasn't been updated for years and is pretty much the same one that we started with. This is something that could be refreshed and made more modern."
"The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
SSIS is ranked 2nd in Data Integration with 69 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. SSIS is rated 7.6, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of SSIS writes "Maintaining the solution and contacting its support team is easy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". SSIS is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Talend Open Studio, IBM InfoSphere DataStage, Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) and AWS Glue, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi iPaaS. See our SSIS vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.