We performed a comparison between Telerik Test Studio and Tricentis Tosca based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The performance and load testing are very good."
"The way it identifies elements is good."
"Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."
"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."
"Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me."
"The most valuable features of Tricentis Tosca are the ease of use, you do not need to program if you do not want to."
"It's a simple tool, particularly in terms of system testing. You can also convert and automate using Tricentis Tosca with ease."
"We have multiple applications, and it supports parallel execution. It has mobile automation."
"The tool's most valuable feature is Tosca Commander."
"The solution has plenty of features compared to other solutions."
"The automation engine is very strong, and it is very competitive in the market in terms of features. They develop a lot of features."
"Multiple scanning engines to automate many different applications."
"I face no challenges or stability issues."
"There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test."
"Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy."
"I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding."
"It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."
"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."
"Setup wasn't that straightforward; it was more complex. It all depends on the environment, because there were a lot of errors on our applications. Therefore, it wasn't an easy setup for us."
"The tool lags in client-based applications. We have also encountered issues with the features in integrations."
"I would like to see better integration with other testing tools."
"The UI does not have the option of automating the scroll bars."
"The support we received from Tricentis Tosca was good, but it can improve."
"Tricentis Tosca could improve on the ease of use. There is a steep learning curve. The reporting section could be better and some of the new features could be simplified. Additionally, the user management of the client and the server are confusing. There should not be two."
"I would like to see more implementation of AI on the self-healing aspect. That would be like the next step."
"Security, UI, and basic performance improvements could be done to the product to enhance its use."
Telerik Test Studio is ranked 18th in Functional Testing Tools with 5 reviews while Tricentis Tosca is ranked 1st in Functional Testing Tools with 98 reviews. Telerik Test Studio is rated 8.0, while Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Telerik Test Studio writes "Very good performance and load testing capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Does not require coding experience to use and comes with productivity and time-saving features ". Telerik Test Studio is most compared with Selenium HQ, Ranorex Studio, SmartBear TestComplete, Katalon Studio and Visual Studio Test Professional, whereas Tricentis Tosca is most compared with Katalon Studio, OpenText UFT One, Worksoft Certify, Postman and Testim. See our Telerik Test Studio vs. Tricentis Tosca report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors, best Regression Testing Tools vendors, and best Test Automation Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.