We performed a comparison between Telerik Test Studio and UiPath Test Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Test Automation Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The way it identifies elements is good."
"Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."
"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."
"Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me."
"The performance and load testing are very good."
"The document understanding is good."
"UiPath's most valuable features are reusability and low-code aspects. It works across both desktop and web applications."
"Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable."
"We are finding bugs and defects much faster."
"It's effective at testing whatever automation we've built or making sure the automation we've built is working fine."
"In terms of integration with other lifecycle tools and applications, UiPath Test Suite works very well because of the basis of RPA, and how RPA and automation can handle different applications and different areas of expertise."
"It's useful for automating tasks."
"We also don't develop test robots like typing codes; we program them with drag-and-drop features."
"I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding."
"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."
"Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy."
"There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test."
"It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."
"We have output arguments in the workflow. We can check results only by using those arguments. It would be better to have some more options, such as screen variables. For example, in a workflow, if we want to check if an activity is present inside, we should be able to get the output to UiPath Test Suite through the activity itself. That would be great for testing."
"I don't rate its ability to automate very well."
"We'd like to see the solution integrate with more code or local frameworks."
"UiPath’s Test Suite manual testing doesn’t work for our organization based on how the QA Analysts do their manual testing and the artifacts that are needed for deployment."
"The reporting could be improved. Often, we need to email a report to higher management, we can directly get the report from there. Also, the error reporting could be better."
"The product releases sometimes have issues."
"Orchestrator is not easy to use or understand."
"UiPath needs to improve its Test Manager feature. Defect management and reporting also need improvement."
Telerik Test Studio is ranked 18th in Test Automation Tools with 5 reviews while UiPath Test Suite is ranked 6th in Test Automation Tools with 17 reviews. Telerik Test Studio is rated 8.0, while UiPath Test Suite is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Telerik Test Studio writes "Very good performance and load testing capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath Test Suite writes "Can be used by non-developers, and saves us time, but the manual testing needs improvement". Telerik Test Studio is most compared with Selenium HQ, Ranorex Studio, SmartBear TestComplete and Katalon Studio, whereas UiPath Test Suite is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT One, SmartBear TestComplete and froglogic Squish. See our Telerik Test Studio vs. UiPath Test Suite report.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
