We performed a comparison between Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and VMware Carbon Black Endpoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"The main thing is that I feel safe. Because the processes that have been used to get a handle on the attackers are much better than other competitors"
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"he solution is an anti-malware product that integrates well with other vendor products such as firewalls, SIEM, etc. It captures threat intelligence and gives you better visibility. The product also has sandboxing features."
"Trellix has a user-friendly interface."
"The product is user-friendly."
"Blocking browser navigation is a feature of the solution with which we have experienced success."
"The product provides a one-click recovery of encrypted files."
"The biggest strength of the solution is that it's an integrated product that includes EDR and antivirus."
"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...I rate the solution's technical support team a nine and a half or ten out of ten."
"Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) offers endpoint protection and helps collect information while also allowing users to investigate malicious files in an IT environment...It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"This is a stable product."
"Behavioral Monitoring stops known malicious events before they even begin."
"Once the solution is installed and configured correctly it does not require a lot of hands-on attention until you need upgrading."
"We can access computers remotely if we need to."
"The solution has a very nice API on the back end for remoting into a system and executing scripts or utilizing self automation."
"It is stable and easy to set up."
"The most valuable asset is the time-lining capability for any breach activity."
"The threat analysis functionality is good."
"The data analysis is the most valuable because of the whitelist database. It is different than standard IDS solutions."
"We've encountered challenges during API deployment, occasionally resulting in unstable environments."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"Intelligence aspects need improvement"
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"The solution is not stable."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"An area for improvement in McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is the historical search. For example: when you have information on the artifact and a precedent, you want to do a search, and that is a bit lacking in the tool."
"The main drawbacks are resources and processing time, as it consumes a lot of CPU and RAM."
"One of the issues about the product stems from the failure to work on its administrative scalability. The aforementioned area can be considered for improvement."
"The solution lacks the ability to integrate with external platforms. In future releases of the solution, I would like to see the solution increase its integration capabilities with external platforms."
"The technical support must be improved."
"The dashboard and reporting features are not so user-friendly or intuitive, so they need some work."
"The CPU utilization of the product is quite high compared to its competitors."
"The endpoints and utilization are too high, which impacts the production activity."
"The solution would be more effective if there was a way to block automatically based on behavior."
"The endpoint machines need improvement."
"The directions for Splunk are spot on, but it is difficult to find anything on integration with AlienVault,"
"Its compatibility can be improved. It did crash a server during deployment, which is not something that I want to happen. Its deployment should also be easier. The whole deployment cycle needs to be simplified. It is an enterprise solution, and to set it up right now, you have to be an expert."
"I'm not sure as to the logic of how we've decided to customize it. We've only really used it since February and therefore there may be more to do on that front. That's why it's hard to say if something is missing or if we just aren't utilizing it."
"The device control feature could also be compatible with the user’s profile as well."
"It would be a better solution if Carbon Black Cb Defense had an on-promise solution and a virus auto delete or quarantine."
"Right now, Carbon Black CB Defense doesn't support cloud computing and Kubernetes."
More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is ranked 23rd in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 17 reviews while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is ranked 14th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 63 reviews. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is rated 7.4, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) writes "Multifeatured, with web control, advanced threat protection, and threat prevention capabilities, but its alerting and reporting features need improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Carbon Black Endpoint writes "Centralization via the cloud allows us to protect and control people working from home". Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is most compared with Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), Trellix Active Response, Cynet, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and CrowdStrike Falcon, whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Trend Micro Deep Security and Cisco Secure Endpoint. See our Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.