We performed a comparison between Visual Studio Test Professional and Zeenyx AscentialTest based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Visual Studio Test Professional is its ease of use."
"The tool is flexible and easy to manage. We use it since it is scalable and easy to use. It integrates with solutions."
"Visual Studio is highly powerful. It's probably the best software development tool on the market."
"What I like most about Visual Studio Test Professional is the way people publish templates and publish integration."
"The user interface is very friendly."
"The most valuable feature is the in-built support for C# and .NET projects."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a very scalable solution."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a scalable solution."
"AscentialTest's object recognition in snapshots is a robust feature that goes beyond standard elements, even accurately identifying objects within Datawindows."
"The most valuable feature of AscentialTest for us is that it fully supports PowerBuilder."
"It’s been really easy to automate the same application TestComplete struggled with. I have been able to automate two of our key applications in just a few months. I haven’t even taken their training."
"If you use the PowerBuilder application, do choose AscentialTest without thinking twice."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"Sometimes Visual Studio is slow. It uses a lot of resources like memory and processing power. You should optimize the performance by only installing what you need on your machine. Don't install unnecessary things that will slow your machine."
"Over the years, I haven't identified any specific enhancements that I desire; Visual Studio has consistently met my requirements seamlessly and flawlessly."
"The service right now is far too expensive. You need to pay per user."
"The pricing of this solution should be lowered."
"The integration with Git needs improving because it is a bit disjointed and unpredictable."
"We would like to be able to easily integrate this solution with our continuous integration tools, such as Jenkins."
"The product must provide more automation."
"Streamlining the retrieval of results from individual test set runs would be beneficial."
"The only thing I can't wait for is for Zeenyx to add automating Mobile apps."
"Classes are not as object-oriented as I would like, but I am a programmer and not QA so I expect a lot."
"I would like to see an improvement in the User Interface."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 46 reviews while Zeenyx AscentialTest is ranked 19th in Functional Testing Tools with 13 reviews. Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6, while Zeenyx AscentialTest is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zeenyx AscentialTest writes "Robust automation with reusable steps and seamless integration". Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and TestRail, whereas Zeenyx AscentialTest is most compared with Tricentis Tosca and SmartBear TestComplete. See our Visual Studio Test Professional vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.