We performed a comparison between VMware Aria Operations for Logs and Wazuh based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution's simplicity, flexibility, and extensibility are valuable features as we can integrate everything in vRealize."
"The system's management and its alerts are the most valuable aspects of the solution."
"The events are notably more descriptive, aiding in security and event analysis. We've also integrated Sky Collector, providing valuable insights and solutions for troubleshooting."
"One of the things I like about it is its interface. When it comes to generating reports on VMs and stuff, it's very quick. This is very handy for the technical team, who need to generate reports quickly. So that's really good."
"The setup and installation are very easy."
"It gives the customer a quick overview, so they don't have to dig. There's a clear dashboard with many sensors in a single space. He gets a helicopter view of his environment, but he can investigate further if there are serious issues. It's pretty user-friendly."
"It is a highly stable solution...It is a highly scalable solution."
"The trace log is the solution's most valuable feature. It's very helpful in troubleshooting problems."
"Wazuh has very flexible and robust features."
"The most valuable feature of Wazuh is the ELK for doing an investigation."
"Wazuh's logging features integrate seamlessly with AWS cloud-native services. There are also Wazuh agent configurations for different use cases, like vulnerability scanning, host-based intrusion detection, and file integrity monitoring."
"The MITRE ATT&CK correlation is most valuable."
"Integrates with various open-source and paid products, allowing for flexibility in customization based on use cases."
"Some of the strengths of Wazuh that stand out for us include its scalability when deployed on Azure, its open-source nature, which allows for customization based on our needs, and its compatibility with various security solutions like threat intelligence platforms."
"It has efficient SCA capabilities."
"The configuration assessment and Pile integrity monitoring features are decent."
"Integration with other vendors is something that could be improved, they could add more vendors."
"I think that it should be able to integrate with other third-party backup and recovery solutions, more that it does now."
"It's great for VMware, but it would be good if they had third-party logins."
"The solution should be more user-friendly. The user interface and dashboard could be simplified."
"I would like to see more tutorials or at least an introduction video from the supplier, so you can become proficient and get the most out of the solution. You might not get the full benefit from a logging or reporting solution because you might not have a particular tool enabled. You could leave something out of your analysis because you aren't aware of it or you don't know how to set it up."
"They should improve their web interface to make it more user-friendly."
"The monitoring landscape is getting bigger. When it comes to infrastructure monitoring, we need more visibility. VMware needs to integrate more related applications and third-party products. That would make it more appealing to an audience beyond the VMware team."
"Log Insight should be better at dealing with audits and security logs. We use another product called QRadar for that."
"Scalability is a challenge because it is distributed architecture and it uses Elastic DB. Their Elastic DB doesn't allow open source waste application."
"They need to go towards integrating with more cloud applications and not just OS like Windows and Linux."
"Wazuh doesn't cover sources of events as well as Splunk. You can integrate Splunk with many sources of events, but it's a painful process to take care of some sources of events with Wazuh."
"I think that the next release should be more suitable for large enterprises, because currently they are not because large companies do not rely on open source solutions."
"They could include flexibility and customization capabilities by modifying for customers based on partner agreements."
"Its user interface for sure can be improved. It is not so comfortable to use if you're looking for specific logs."
"Its configuration process is time-consuming."
"I have yet to find the same capability in Wazuh to get logs from different sources into the system"
More VMware Aria Operations for Logs Pricing and Cost Advice →
VMware Aria Operations for Logs is ranked 9th in Log Management with 24 reviews while Wazuh is ranked 2nd in Log Management with 38 reviews. VMware Aria Operations for Logs is rated 8.2, while Wazuh is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of VMware Aria Operations for Logs writes "Gives a clear forecast about existing machines, and has an automation feature that helps in reducing a lot of ambiguities and managing operational efficiencies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wazuh writes "It integrates seamlessly with AWS cloud-native services". VMware Aria Operations for Logs is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Elastic Security, LogRhythm SIEM, Graylog and IBM Security QRadar, whereas Wazuh is most compared with Elastic Security, Security Onion, AlienVault OSSIM, Splunk Enterprise Security and Graylog. See our VMware Aria Operations for Logs vs. Wazuh report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
