We performed a comparison between webMethods.io Integration and WSO2 API Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."
"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."
"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."
"The solution is scalable."
"I like the tool's scalability."
"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."
"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."
"Most of the time, we need to install a plug-in without having any lapse in services or restarting the application. The WSO2 platform can do all deployments without any downtime."
"A complete integration suite and a good platform."
"WSO2 API Manager is a stable solution."
"This solution is a little bit faster, easier to use, and has better integration than the other solutions I have experienced."
"It's very scalable, which is one of the best features."
"The product is easy to use."
"The documentation is good."
"The main feature — the publication of the API, the management section — is great in general."
"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."
"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."
"The solution's release management feature could be better."
"It is difficult to maintain."
"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."
"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."
"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"I think they could greatly improve the general UX with their solutions."
"The user interface needs to improve, it is a bit outdated."
"WSO2 API Manager could increase their security compliance."
"From a product perspective, the first thing is that although the documentation provided by WSO2 is good, it could be much better. We're in the middle of a complex migration, moving away from VMs to Kubernetes with the latest version of WSO2 and good documentation is essential to us right now."
"WSO2 API Manager should improve its marketplace subscription model and documentation in order to reach a higher level in the market."
"They don't have different URLs for administrators."
"Lacks some new features and updated functionalities."
"The technical support must be improved."
webMethods.io Integration is ranked 29th in API Management with 7 reviews while WSO2 API Manager is ranked 8th in API Management with 33 reviews. webMethods.io Integration is rated 7.8, while WSO2 API Manager is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 API Manager writes "Reliable with good capabilities and good support". webMethods.io Integration is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, SAP Cloud Platform, Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management and SSIS, whereas WSO2 API Manager is most compared with Apigee, Kong Gateway Enterprise, Amazon API Gateway and Apache APISIX. See our WSO2 API Manager vs. webMethods.io Integration report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.