We performed a comparison between ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) and RSA enVision based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Once the rules are defined, it is capable of detecting minute changes in the systems, which are effectively based on the entries in the log."
"For the typical malware or intrusion, this solution assists us by identifying the symptoms based on network traffic from the application servers."
"The most valuable features of ArcSight ESM are the dashboards, ease of management for anyone, and simple for teams to provide reports related to cyber security. There are a lot of good features that are provided."
"Once the rules are defined, it becomes easy to detect changes and generate automated logs."
"The out-of-the-box rules that help us configure functioning rules within the environment are valuable."
"The real-time analysis adds value."
"The most valuable feature of ArcSight ESM is its ease of use."
"What I found most valuable in ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is its good integration with third-party products. The solution also has good core capabilities."
"The most valuable feature is the management features. It's capable of managing large enterprises."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the reporting."
"The configuration part is very easy...The technical support was sincere in their responses...I rate the technical support a nine out of ten."
"The dashboard looks a bit cumbersome."
"The user interface of ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager could improve. It is not very good. Additionally, they could integrate the web interface better."
"When we need to consume old events, we have to wait for a long time. ArcSight should improve the database capability to reply to queries faster. It would also be interesting if they implemented network visibility. For example, they could add a feature like NetWitness with a model just for looking through the packets."
"The tool should improve its UI. It also should make data more searchable."
"Customer service during the transition from HPE to Micro Focus was abysmal where it became disruptive to our service delivery."
"The stability isn't quite perfect. We occasionally run into problems."
"The roadmap is not clear."
"ArcSight ESM could improve by adding more features and documentation. There needs to be more documentation."
"The integration could be easier, it should support more products."
"In general, the solution currently isn't user-friendly."
"RSA enVision log manager is out of date and is not in use anymore."
More ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) Pricing and Cost Advice →
ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is ranked 12th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 93 reviews while RSA enVision is ranked 35th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 5 reviews. ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is rated 7.8, while RSA enVision is rated 6.8. The top reviewer of ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) writes "Allows for monitoring logs according to industry standards within ESM but has a total capacity capped at 12 TB, limiting real-time data retention periods". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA enVision writes "Though the solution offers good technical support, it needs to be made more user-friendly ". ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Trellix ESM, ArcSight Intelligence, IBM Security QRadar and Elastic Security, whereas RSA enVision is most compared with NetWitness Platform, Splunk Enterprise Security, IBM Security QRadar and Microsoft Sentinel. See our ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) vs. RSA enVision report.
See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.