We performed a comparison between Coralogix and Grafana based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is easy to use and to start with."
"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."
"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."
"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."
"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"Almost any kind of visualization is possible with Grafana and all dashboards are configurable."
"The solution can scale well."
"We can write queries in different languages, which is beneficial for visualization."
"Grafana's best features are live monitoring and alerts."
"Grafana has improved our analysis capability to solve an issue, increasing the co-working between IT services and business services."
"Plugin: Connecting Grafana to multiple APIs of leading monitoring tools and alerting tools."
"This solution provides valuable insights into the health of our infrastructure in real time."
"It has good stability."
"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."
"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."
"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."
"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."
"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."
"The documentation of the tool could be improved"
"The security needs to be improved, such as the capacity to add permissions on dashboards."
"I have a problem with Grafana in the area of documentation."
"The product's configuration for saving files could be improved."
"One area for improvement in Grafana is that depending on your version, you have to pay for the features, making the license expensive. It would be great if the licensing model could be more flexible. In the next release of Grafana, I want cluster creation to be available, which would help in Grafana deployment and scaling. Currently, the scaling process for the solution is a bit complicated."
"I had issues with the solution's configuration part."
"Setting up alerts via Grafana is a bit complicated, and alerting needs to improve."
"The technical support has room for improvement."
"Grafana need to improve the logging functionality."
Coralogix is ranked 26th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 7 reviews while Grafana is ranked 6th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 39 reviews. Coralogix is rated 8.4, while Grafana is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Coralogix writes "Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Grafana writes "Agent-free with great dashboards and an active community". Coralogix is most compared with Datadog, Sentry, New Relic, Elastic Search and Logz.io, whereas Grafana is most compared with New Relic, Azure Monitor, Sentry, Dynatrace and VMware Aria Operations for Applications. See our Coralogix vs. Grafana report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.