We performed a comparison between New Relic and Elastic Observability based on real PeerSpot user reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Users prefer Elastic Observability over New Relic due to its comprehensive visualization and metrics, better control over backend calls, and AI integration, including simple-to-use machine learning. Despite its straightforward setup, users suggest that New Relic could improve error debugging, correlation with logs, historical data retention, and AI and machine learning capabilities.
"The solution allows us to dig deep into data."
"Machine learning is the most valuable feature of this solution."
"It is a powerful tool that allows users to collect and transform logs as needed, enabling flexible visualization and analysis."
"The product has connectors to many services."
"Good design and easy to use once implemented."
"Elastic APM has plenty of features, such as the Elastic server for Kibana and many additional plugins. It's a comprehensive tool when used as a logging platform."
"The solution has been stable in our usage."
"I have built a mini business intelligence system based on Elastic Observability."
"The most valuable features are the dashboards and tracing."
"We are able to drill down and see what is going on in the system."
"It has prevented failures from occurring in our production environment."
"The synthetic alert is the most valuable feature in New Relic APM. I also like the time travel feature and find traceability useful in the solution. New Relic APM also has good response times."
"The most valuable features of New Relic are the reports and ease of use."
"You don't have to go through a list of 500 servers."
"The simplicity of the dashboard is very good."
"The most valuable feature of New Relic is its ease of use."
"The tool's scalability involves a more complex implementation process. It requires careful calculations to determine the number of nodes needed, the specifications of each node, and the configuration of hot, warm, and cold zones for data storage. Additionally, managing log retention policies adds further complexity. The solution's pricing also needs to be cheaper."
"The price is the only issue in the solution. It can be made better and cheaper."
"Improving code insight related to infrastructure and network, particularly focusing on aspects such as firewalls, switches, routers, and testing would be beneficial."
"Elastic Observability is difficult to use. There are only three options for customization but this can be difficult for our use case. We do not have other options to choose the metrics shown, such as CPU or memory usage."
"There's a steep learning curve if you've never used this solution before."
"Elastic Observability is an excellent product for monitoring and visibility, but it lacks predictive analytics. Most solutions are aligned with the AIOps requirements, but this piece is missing in Elastic and should be included."
"There could be more low-code features included in the product."
"The cost must be made more transparent."
"Data Dog captures the entire session and then provides it as a video player path, which gives more insight into what the user was doing. It's pretty impressive. New Relic does that, yet it only captures using a couple of screenshots, which is not very detailed since you are unable to see the entire user flow."
"We have had issues with our agents going offline."
"The older view is much better than the new view that they have. We'd like to go back to that previous version. The user interface just isn't as nice as it used to be."
"The price could improve."
"It gives you amazing statistics, but doesn’t give you enough information about what to do with the statistics."
"They need to improve the alerting and dashboarding as these are the key features in DevOps."
"The price needs improvement."
"Real-user monitoring would be helpful as it would help me to really understand the client-side performance of the application."
Elastic Observability is ranked 7th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 22 reviews while New Relic is ranked 3rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 152 reviews. Elastic Observability is rated 7.8, while New Relic is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Elastic Observability writes "The user interface framework lets us do custom development when needed. ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of New Relic writes "Has a simple user interface and end-to-end monitoring and self-healing features". Elastic Observability is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Azure Monitor, Datadog and Sentry, whereas New Relic is most compared with Dynatrace, Datadog, Grafana, Prometheus and Azure Monitor. See our Elastic Observability vs. New Relic report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors, best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors, and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
