We performed a comparison between Elastic Security and ESET Endpoint Protection Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the ability to collect authentication information from service providers."
"ELK Logstash is easy and fast, at least for the initial setup with the out of box uses."
"The visualization is very good."
"The solution has a good community surrounding it for lots of helpful documentation for troubleshooting purposes."
"The product has huge integration varieties available."
"ELK documentation is very good, so never needed to contact technical support."
"The most valuable features are the speed, detail, and visualization. It has the latest standards."
"Its flexibility is most valuable. We can have a number of scenarios, and we can get logs from anything. If we know how to use Logstash, we can tweak it in many ways. This makes the logging search on Elastic very easy."
"It's light. I almost don't know that I am using it."
"This solution has a traditional antivirus, I believe that signature-based detection is most valuable."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the protection itself, which works well for us."
"The most valuable feature is the antispam module, which comes in the bundle."
"ESET Endpoint Security is stable, I did not have any issues with it."
"The tool protects everything."
"The solution provides good accessibility and is not heavy on resources when there are updates or when it is in operation."
"It has a clean and clear interface."
"Its documentation should be a bit better. I have to spend at least a couple of hours to find the solution for a simple thing. When we buy Elastic, training is not included for free with Elastic. We have to pay extra for the training. They should include training in the price."
"One thing they could add is a quick step to enable users who don't have a solid background to build a dashboard and quickly search, without difficulty."
"The solution does not have a UI and this is one of the reasons we are looking for another solution."
"Their visuals and graphs need to be better."
"It would be better if Elastic Security had less storage for data. My customers do not like this. Other vendors have local support in different countries, but Elastic Security doesn't. I would like to have Operational Technology (OT) security in the next release."
"We had issues with scalability. Logstash was not scaling and aggregation was getting delayed. We moved to Fluentd making our stack from ELK to EFK."
"If you compare this with CrowdStrike or Carbon Black, they can improve."
"Improvements in Elastic Security could include refining and normalizing queries to make them more user-friendly, enhancing the user experience with better documentation, and addressing any latency issues."
"ESET Endpoint Security should offer more integration with multi-attack frameworks."
"I would like for ESET to create a central management solution. This would make it practical to use the internet for medium-sized networks."
"The solution’s console management and scalability should be improved."
"The solution could improve by having higher-level security and reporting."
"I would like them to use AI features to do preventative virus protection."
"We would like to see more options in the help menu for users."
"We do get false positives."
"It would be great to have VIP functions added to the solution in a future release."
More ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Elastic Security is ranked 5th in Log Management with 59 reviews while ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is ranked 11th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 96 reviews. Elastic Security is rated 7.6, while ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Elastic Security writes "A stable and scalable tool that provides visibility along with the consolidation of logs to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ESET Endpoint Protection Platform writes "Easy to set up with good security and rapidly improving capabilities". Elastic Security is most compared with Wazuh, Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, IBM Security QRadar and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, whereas ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Fortinet FortiEDR. See our ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Elastic Security report.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.