We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiGate-VM and Juniper SRX Series Firewall based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Fortinet FortiGate-VM is highly regarded for its robust security features, including geofencing, IPS, antivirus, and a user-friendly interface. Additionally, it is praised for its strong firewall capabilities. Juniper SRX Series Firewall is appreciated for its ease of use and intuitive interface. It is also valued for its reliable support, site-to-site VPN functionality, and effective firewall protection.
Fortinet FortiGate-VM has room for improvement in several areas including key activation, internal log management, cloud management, monitoring tools, hardening, availability, clustering, throughput, customization, pricing model, troubleshooting forum, and guidance. Juniper SRX Series Firewall requires improvements in capacity limitations, pricing strategy, reporting and alerts, user interface, device reliability, documentation, and feature enhancements.
Service and Support: The customer service for Fortinet FortiGate-VM has mixed feedback. Some customers appreciate the fast response and expertise of the support team, while others believe there is room for improvement. Customers generally express contentment with the customer service of Juniper SRX Series Firewall, finding the support to be valuable and prompt. Nonetheless, there have been occasions where response times were slower.
Ease of Deployment: The setup process for Fortinet FortiGate-VM is generally simple and user-friendly, with users noting its ease of deployment. The initial setup for Juniper SRX Series Firewall can be completed relatively quickly for small-scale branch offices yet may require more time for complex environments. While some users found it to be effortless and plug-and-play, others mentioned a learning curve and the necessity of CLI experience.
Pricing: The setup cost for Fortinet FortiGate-VM is flexible and reasonable, offering choices for yearly or monthly licenses. Juniper SRX Series Firewall is priced in the middle, with a generally straightforward setup cost.
ROI: Fortinet FortiGate-VM provides enhanced security and stability, resulting in a high ROI rating from users. It is crucial to select the appropriate size initially to ensure a favorable return on investment. Juniper SRX Series Firewall offers reliability, uptime, and advanced security features, leading to a positive ROI for users.
Comparison Results: Fortinet FortiGate-VM is the preferred choice over Juniper SRX Series Firewall. Customers appreciate Fortinet FortiGate-VM for its robust security features, user-friendly nature, effortless deployment, and intuitive interface. The product also stands out for its exceptional support provided during deployment.
"Reliability is the best feature. We faced some issues when we were setting it up, but the service, portal, and administration are good."
"The main reason why I purchased the particular unit was that it had good reviews and what other people were saying as far as its completeness and its leading capabilities in terms of endpoint security was very good."
"This solution made it very easy to manage our bandwidth."
"The most important features with FortiGate are the web filter and application controls. We can control our internet usage and use the web filter for application purposes."
"I have found Fortinet FortiGate to be scalable."
"This is an easy solution to deploy."
"FortiGate is very simple to manage and easy to use."
"It does a lot for you for intrusion protection and as an antivirus. The threat management bundle is worth the money. You don't need another company to monitor your web traffic for you. You can do everything yourself on the firewall. You restrict your own black list for people on the firewall. You don't need to pay some other company for another product to do that for you. The firewall can do that for you. So, it's an easy-to-use product for people to be independent. They don't need to rely on other vendors to do what the firewall can do. They can do everything."
"The VM it's very quick for deployment. If we need to have a POC for a customer, if we don't have any hardware physically at our premises, at our store, in our office, we can download the VM from Fortinet and install all the VM to their environment in order to run it. If we have a customer that says "let's start tomorrow" we are able to do that in a way that's not possible with a hardware version."
"We work in the archiving domain where a secure environment is very important. We have some special requirements regarding the security of infrastructure."
"The initial setup was quite straightforward."
"The dashboards are a good feature."
"I like the visibility and monitoring features because they're easy to use to monitor traffic. Features like geo-blocking and more have AI, and we're currently using all of it. But for now, we're only using geo-blocking, and we're able to block traffic from different countries. I also like that it's highly responsive. VM04 is also very powerful."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"The standard features, including the filtering, are quite good. All the basic features are pretty useful for us."
"In terms of administration, it's perfect."
"Most of our clients use it as a traditional firewall, blocking Layer 3 and Layer 4, blocking by transport."
"It protects from distributed denial-of-service attacks with Screen Options."
"When compared to Palo Alto, Juniper is a better choice when it comes to the enterprise network and connectivity."
"The technical support is quite good."
"There is a lot of flexibility in how you can commit, check, and back out of a configuration."
"The most valuable features of the Juniper SRX Series Firewall are the user-friendly UI, and accessing the solution is simple."
"I've found the security features, such as IDS and the VPN most valuable."
"CLI: Junos CLI is very easy to use, and it is also very easy to find back items in the configuration and to change them."
"In the future, I would like to see improvements made to cloud-based management."
"They have to just improve its performance when we enable all UTM features. When you enable all the features, the performance of FortiGate, as well as of Sophos and SonicWall, goes down."
"Improvement is needed in the Web Filter quotas to restrict users with allocated quotas."
"It could use better throughput on some of the smaller boxes for the branch offices."
"Technical support for this solution can be improved."
"The stability could be a bit better."
"The search tool needs improvement. It's very difficult to search for policies right now."
"The main aspect of FortiGate that could be improved is load balancing. Our management team does not want to buy another appliance for only load balancing."
"One thing that can be better is added automation. And, on top of that, enhanced security when it comes to the automation itself."
"The users must buy FortiSIEM to get advanced analytics."
"Customization needs improvement."
"The one thing that could be improved is the integration with the exchange. The gateway level controls can be enhanced a bit more. For example, it's still little here and there. You do get malicious attacks and suspicious emails like spam. It's not like Sophos where we got a lot of spam email, and yet, it's still relatively vulnerable. It can be upgraded, maybe with a fifth-generation firmware that it is ready for unknown threats."
"The price is problematic."
"The product does not have a good graphical interface."
"With FortiGate, we sometimes encounter bugs in various operating systems."
"Fortinet could improve the availability and delivery of its products. It takes four to six weeks for every purchase to arrive."
"This solution needs to update for "Next Generation" needs."
"The capacity can be limiting. We have outgrown its capacity. You can only scale up to a certain extent, depending on the device purchased."
"The range of devices should be expanded to include those suitable for a small implementation. Juniper does not have any lower-priced SRX models, useful perhaps for a single ATM or a single bank branch."
"The solution isn't very granular or detailed."
"I would like to have a better web UI for administration. Juniper could simplify the web UI and make it more compatible with mobile devices."
"It needs better interoperability with Cisco gear."
"I think improvement can be done to the security part, particularly the UDM, and the product should have a user-friendly interface similar to FortiGate. It should have the Azure RBAC in the next release."
"The training videos that are available need to be improved, and made more educative."
Fortinet FortiGate-VM is ranked 9th in Firewalls with 113 reviews while Juniper SRX Series Firewall is ranked 18th in Firewalls with 86 reviews. Fortinet FortiGate-VM is rated 8.4, while Juniper SRX Series Firewall is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiGate-VM writes "An easy-to-manage and configure tool that provides ample documentation to help with the setup phase". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper SRX Series Firewall writes "Highly scalable, user-friendly UI, and easy to maintain". Fortinet FortiGate-VM is most compared with Azure Firewall, Palo Alto Networks VM-Series, Fortinet FortiOS, OPNsense and Cisco Secure Firewall, whereas Juniper SRX Series Firewall is most compared with Cisco Secure Firewall, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Netgate pfSense, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls and Check Point NGFW. See our Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs. Juniper SRX Series Firewall report.
See our list of best Firewalls vendors and best Firewalls vendors.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
