We performed a comparison between Google Cloud Storage and Wasabi based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's easy to use."
"I have more than enough personal storage and have had no security issues."
"It is easy to use."
"It's very practical and reliable."
"The most valuable features of Google Cloud Storage are flexibility and sustainability."
"It's easy to use."
"You do not need to install anything."
"The solution is flexible and very user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is the backups."
"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is its cost."
"Wasabi is an easy-to-use solution."
"Basically, I set Wasabi up and forget it. I'll monitor it every once in a while just to make sure that it's working correctly."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The tool is very user-friendly."
"We can store our videos on hot storage, allowing immediate access to them."
"It was a little more complicated when compared to Apple."
"It could be made even more secure and allow for more storage."
"I would prefer more support for alternative operating systems like DSD. The performance could be better because sometimes there are glitches. The price could be better."
"I would like to see better pricing."
"They need to get some parts of the program more mature, like the admin management part as well as the monitoring part."
"Its security should be better from the data security point of view. It should be more secure, and it should get tightly integrated with products such as Google Docs and Google Sheets. Microsoft covers different kinds of tools such as Microsoft Office, Microsoft Word, and Microsoft Excel."
"When compared to one of its competitors, Google Cloud Storage does not have or offer a lot of services to its users. So, this is one of the downsides of the solution."
"Google Cloud Storage can improve by having better integration and migration tools."
"Having the ability to upload and download data using third-party apps such as Mega which can sync to the desktop would be excellent."
"The solution’s user reporting could be improved."
"Setting up users on the appliance should be improved."
"I don't have enough experience to understand the nuances of where they might improve."
"The scalability could be improved."
"The scalability could improve."
"The solution must allow the extension of the retention period."
Google Cloud Storage is ranked 4th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 66 reviews while Wasabi is ranked 8th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 7 reviews. Google Cloud Storage is rated 8.8, while Wasabi is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Google Cloud Storage writes "Flexible, reliable, and beneficial for small sized companies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wasabi writes "An easy-to-use solution that can be used to move local backups to the cloud". Google Cloud Storage is most compared with Amazon S3 Glacier, AT&T Cloud Storage, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Microsoft Azure File Storage and Huawei FusionStorage, whereas Wasabi is most compared with Microsoft Azure File Storage, Amazon S3 Glacier, Amazon S3, Microsoft Azure Object Storage and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP. See our Google Cloud Storage vs. Wasabi report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
