We performed a comparison between HPE 3PAR StoreServ and HPE EVA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Being able to snapshot things for backup purposes has been key. We do that on our databases four times a day."
"The solution, stability, and the performance work well for us."
"We use a virtual domain in 3PAR and we can create individual pools where clients are able to manage their own resources, instead of we, as storage admin, getting involved in that."
"So far, we have yet to have a disk fail on either system, other than one I forced to fail when we first got the system in. So the reliability of the 3PAR system has been outstanding."
"The tool is fast and easy to use. You can also configure it easily. The product also has good performance tuning."
"If there is a problem then the HPE facility will detect it and immediately contact me."
"Resilience and reliability, unmatched. They take good care of us."
"The product lasts a very long time without having to be replaced. It's had a very long life."
"HPE has reliable support for HDD replacement."
"The solution's most valuable feature is storage provisioning, which allows me to easily provision the disk space on the servers."
"There have been no fail-stop failures for the last five years."
"It is very stable."
"I would like an easier user interface and setup to help with deployment. There were many areas of the setup where I was like, “Why don't we do it this way?” Therefore, some of the things in the user interface could have been more refined, so you don't have to click in 5000 different places to accomplish one goal. Less clicks means more efficiency."
"There are some weird things that we can't figure out."
"Our support in the US has been phenomenal, no issues at all. But the European support was poor initially."
"We would like to see better support for iSCSI."
"The price of this solution should be lower."
"The initial setup was complex, due to calculating the amount of performance that we needed for the floor."
"HPE 3PAR StoreServ should increase the storage capacity."
"Needs more flexibility and expansion, and also relocation, a cloud solution."
"I faced some issues during the disk replacement process in HPE EVA."
"Performance could probably be improve with faster controllers, but it is already an old device. We do have performance problems now, but it is a rather old device, so we have what we have."
HPE 3PAR StoreServ is ranked 3rd in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) with 299 reviews while HPE EVA is ranked 9th in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) with 4 reviews. HPE 3PAR StoreServ is rated 8.6, while HPE EVA is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of HPE 3PAR StoreServ writes "The product's technical support is outstanding as I can reach someone right away". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE EVA writes "Has the ability to automatically deal with faulty disks". HPE 3PAR StoreServ is most compared with HPE Primera, Dell Unity XT, HPE Nimble Storage, NetApp AFF and Lenovo ThinkSystem DE Series, whereas HPE EVA is most compared with HPE StorageWorks MSA. See our HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. HPE EVA report.
See our list of best Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) vendors.
We monitor all Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.