We performed a comparison between Aruba Networks Wireless WAN and Cambium Networks Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN can be done quickly, and everything functions smoothly."
"I rate the stability an eight out of ten."
"I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."
"It's stable and reliable."
"The most valuable feature of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is that it is easy to configure. Additionally, with the same configuration with Cisco and Ruckus, we can receive 55 to 60 percent more out of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN."
"I like the solution's ability to add multiple SSIDs on different levels such as enterprise and guest networks."
"The installation process was easy."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of setup and deployment."
"The initial setup is easy to handle. It's quite simple."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is scalable. The XV2 model of the solution can support up to 216 people at a time."
"The product's scalability features are good."
"It's a good product and works well when there is a lot of interference."
"The most valuable features for network performance in the solution are reliability and centralized management through a single controller."
"Cambium Networks' PowerMax feature has been particularly beneficial for WAN connectivity, offering superior coverage compared to other solutions. The standout feature of Cambium Networks for me is its extensive coverage area."
"The solution's coverage range is good, it is easy to use, and deployment is very easy and user-friendly."
"It excels in challenging environments and adverse weather conditions, maintaining high performance without any impact on the link quality."
"The product offers a feature that pinpoints where the devices are to help users find them easily if they want to know where a laptop or tablet is, but it is a feature that needs improvements due to some shortcomings."
"If they provided more updates that would be ideal."
"The integration, pricing, and configuration could always be improved upon."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing, it's quite a premium."
"Support is not good...The support can be improved, especially in India, since whenever I require support, it takes some time."
"We have had stability issues with some types of portable devices."
"From the commercial-side the pricing side is fine but in other aspects, it could be lowered."
"The initial setup is complex."
"Sometimes there are some latencies in devices. Otherwise, it is, for some time, not as stable."
"The modulation could be optimized for better performance, and the configuration should be made adaptive to ensure dynamic adjustments as needed."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN's support services could be better."
"The installation and configuration are a bit complex."
"Cambium's solution is flexible for various connectivity needs, although there are limitations based on the specific equipment and metrics. The indoor coverage typically reaches up to sixty meters and may require external antennas for optimal performance and for outdoor connectivity, Cambium Networks offer excellent scalability and coverage, especially with sectorial access points."
"They could enhance the product's security features, particularly in analyzing and protecting against potential threats."
"The Cambium user interface and configuration should be improved."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is stable but sometimes the 2.4 gigahertz network is sometimes not as stable as the 5 gigahertz. The 5 gigahertz works smoothly with everything, but 2.4 has some problems. If we change the configuration I am not sure if it would fix the problem."
More Cambium Networks Wireless WAN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 5th in Wireless WAN with 47 reviews while Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 3rd in Wireless WAN with 24 reviews. Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.4, while Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN writes "It's reliable, cost-effective, and easy to troubleshoot". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN writes "Provides point-to-point and point-to-multipoint connectivity and user-friendly solution". Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless, Fortinet FortiWLM and Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, whereas Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless, Ruckus Wireless WAN and Cisco Wireless WAN. See our Aruba Networks Wireless WAN vs. Cambium Networks Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.