We performed a comparison between Aruba Networks Wireless WAN and Ubiquiti Wireless based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I rate the stability an eight out of ten."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of setup and deployment."
"Its most valuable feature is the ease of use."
"An engineer with enough experience can tune the network however they want. It's crucial. It's good to customize our information security how we like it and configure the solution to achieve the level of stability we need."
"What I like most about Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is seamless integration from an endpoint perspective. Another valuable feature of the product is that it supports certificate-based authentication."
"The GUI is user-friendly and the dashboards are good."
"It's quite stable."
"There is a clustering feature, so the APs immediately switch back to the next available controller. The users will not notice any impact and will feel connected to the network. They will not notice any disconnection."
"Ubiquiti Wireless is a reasonably priced, easy to use, stable and reliable product."
"This access point provides internet to every lab on campus, including the computer laboratory"
"It has a user-friendly interface."
"Their hardware is very good."
"The most valuable aspect of Ubiquiti is the ease of setup. It's easy to set up, secure, and use. It works on an adoption basis. I can pull the system up, design a network, and pull 20 different Ubiquiti units into it."
"The most valuable feature of Ubiquiti Wireless is the ease of configuration."
"It's very easy to deploy."
"The setup is quite simple."
"Sometimes, the configuration part of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN can be complex, and if you fail to understand the product at once, you may not even know about some features that you can apply to your network, and they may go unused."
"They have to work on their Aruba Central cloud platform. There are still some glitches such as not showing proper user details. When we removed the AP from the Aruba Central cloud, it showed up as being connected to Aruba Central. They need to fix these issues."
"This solution needs different models that are more specialized for certain customers."
"The solution would be improved with a better interface."
"This product needs more flecibility with switching technologies."
"Right now, the integration between the support that you are getting from Hewlett-Packard, which is the parent company, and Aruba, they're not meshing together."
"The support needs improvement because it is not very good in terms of response time."
"It works. We don't look at it any deeper than that and don't find any features ar missing."
"The technical support services need improvement."
"After upgrades to the interface, some features disappear."
"The range and maybe the quality of the signal can be improved. I had a feeling that the range wasn't long enough. Unfortunately, beyond a certain range, the signal was too weak. If I'm not mistaken, it must have been something like 100 or more than 100 meters, but I'm not sure. So, one improvement I wish for this equipment is to have a longer range, but that could mainly be due to the model we're using."
"We use different models of the solution but in some cases, the security could improve in the adaptive portal, be a little more robust, and easier to use."
"Everything needs to be professionally done."
"My company has to wait for a response from the product's support team. From an improvement perspective, the product's support team should be quicker to respond."
"I would like local support from the parent company."
"Central monitoring is the main functionality that should be included in the product."
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 5th in Wireless WAN with 47 reviews while Ubiquiti Wireless is ranked 1st in Wireless WAN with 68 reviews. Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.4, while Ubiquiti Wireless is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN writes "It's reliable, cost-effective, and easy to troubleshoot". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti Wireless writes "It's cheap and easy to use but isn't suitable for large deployments or complex use cases ". Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, Fortinet FortiWLM and Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, whereas Ubiquiti Wireless is most compared with Ruckus Wireless WAN, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, Aruba Wireless and Cisco Wireless WAN. See our Aruba Networks Wireless WAN vs. Ubiquiti Wireless report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.