We performed a comparison between GuardDuty and Trend Micro Cloud One based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: AWS GuardDuty is highly regarded for its extensive monitoring capabilities, threat detection, and ability to analyze various log sources. Trend Micro Cloud One is highly praised for its vulnerability scanning and ability to provide visibility into critical events. Users have suggested that AWS GuardDuty could improve by adding a mobile version and more dashboard analytics. Reviewers feel that Trend Micro Cloud One should enhance automation, simplify deployment, and offer more competitive pricing.
Service and Support: AWS GuardDuty customers are satisfied with the swift and helpful support they've received from the Amazon team. Cloud One users commended Trend Micro's support team for their extensive knowledge and expertise.
Ease of Deployment: AWS GuardDuty users described the initial as simple and quick. Some Trend Micro Cloud One users said the setup was easy, but others noted that it may pose a challenge for less experienced users.
Pricing: AWS GuardDuty offers a pay-go license, with different pricing tiers based on usage levels. There are no extra costs apart from the standard licensing. Reviewers say Trend Micro Cloud One isn't expensive per se, but the license could be more competitive. Trend Micro offers monthly, quarterly, or annual payment options. Additional services can be purchased at an added cost.
ROI: AWS GuardDuty improves security and builds customer confidence, helping businesses expand. Trend Micro Cloud One provides a versatile return on investment by offering effortless integration and cancellation options, and users have not reported any negative encounters.
Comparison Results: User reviews indicate that AWS GuardDuty is preferred over Trend Micro Cloud One. Reviewers liked GuardDuty's comprehensive monitoring capabilities and advanced threat response. Users find the setup process for GuardDuty to be simple and straightforward, whereas some users reported difficulties with Cloud One. GuardDuty also earned high marks for its reasonable pricing, but users say Trend Micro could lower the price of Cloud One to match competitors.
"The tool identifies issues quickly."
"My favorite feature is Storyline."
"PingSafe offers security solutions for both Kubernetes and CI/CD pipelines."
"The most valuable feature of PingSafe is its integration with most of our technology stack, specifically all of our cloud platforms and ticketing software."
"PingSafe's graph explorer is a valuable tool that lets us visualize all connected services."
"PingSafe offers three key features: vulnerability management notifications, cloud configuration assistance, and security scanning."
"PingSafe can integrate all your cloud accounts and resources you create in the AWS account, We have set it up to scan the AWS transfer services, EC2, security groups, and GitHub."
"The multi-cloud support is valuable. They are expanding to different clouds. It is not restricted to only AWS. It allows us to have different clouds on one platform."
"Deployment is great, and we didn't face any big challenges."
"AWS GuardDuty helps by providing continuous threat detection and signaling potential threats. Its most valuable feature is continuous monitoring. The tool's integration with other AWS services has improved security. It provides continuous monitoring and intelligent threat detection, quickly signaling any issues. I would rate this improvement a seven out of ten."
"The product has automated protection powered by AI/ML, which is now far more powerful than before. It uses AI/ML in its detection algorithm, providing fast and quick results."
"We use the tool for threat detection. AWS includes AI features as well. AWS GuardDuty gives us reports."
"It kinda just gives us another layer of security. So it does provide some sort of comfort that we do have something that is monitoring for abnormal behavior."
"It helps us detect brute-force attacks based on machine learning."
"We have over 1,000 employees, and we monitor their activity through AWS GuardDuty."
"The solution will detect abnormalities in the AWS workload and alert us so that we can monitor and take action."
"It has the best EDR functionality for cloud and typical endpoints."
"The security is good."
"The tech support is excellent. They really know their products. They also know a lot of about the integrations between different solutions."
"Virtual patching is one of the key features, which is executed with their IPS."
"Vision One is versatile and can be integrated with many SIEMs. You're not limited to only one SIEM, such as Microsoft Sentinel. The API integrations are seamless, and we have all the documentation needed to integrate Vision One via API."
"The most valuable features are intrusion prevention and anti-malware capabilities."
"Detection response and cloud conformity are valuable features."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's best features are security analysis, remote access security, and driver security."
"They could generally give us better comprehensive rules."
"We don't get any notifications from PingSafe when the clusters are down."
"In terms of ease of use, initially, it is a bit confusing to navigate around, but once you get used to it, it becomes easier."
"PingSafe is an excellent CSPM tool, but the CWPP features need to improve, and there is a scope for more application security posture management features. There aren't many ASPM solutions on the market, and existing ones are costly. I would like to see PingSafe develop into a single pane of glass for ASPM, CSPM, and CWPP. Another feature I'd like to see is runtime protection."
"Sometimes the Storyline ID is a bit wacky."
"Their search feature could be better."
"The integration with Oracle has room for improvement."
"The could improve their mean time to detect."
"Some of the pain points in Amazon GuardDuty was the cost. When compared to some of the other services, depending on how many we had to monitor, if we had a huge range of accounts, as our accounts increased, we had a cost factor that came into play. Sometimes there were issues, for example, with findings that came up, we wanted to add notes and there were issues back then where notes couldn't be entered properly. If we wanted to leave a note such as "Okay, we have assessed this and this is how we feel", or "This is a false positive", Amazon GuardDuty wasn't allowing us to do that. Even with the suppression of certain findings, there was some issue that we had faced at one time. Those were some of the pain points of the solution."
"An improvement would be to have a mobile version where remote workers can log in and monitor and fix issues."
"There is currently no consolidated dashboard for AWS GuardDuty. It would be helpful if they could provide a dashboard based on severity levels (high, medium, low) and offer insights account-wise, especially for users utilizing automation structures."
"Improvement-wise, Amazon GuardDuty should have an overall dashboard analytics function so we could see what's in the current environment, and then in addition to that, provide best practices and recommendations, particularly to provide some type of observability, and then figure out the login side of it, based on our current environment, in terms of what we're not monitoring and what we should monitor. The solution should also give us a sample code configuration to implement that added feature or feature request. What I'd like to see in the next release of Amazon GuardDuty are more security analytics, reporting, and monitoring. They should provide recommendations and additional options that answer questions such as "Hey, what can we see in our environment?", "What should we implement within the environment?", What's recommended?" We know that cost will always be associated with that, but Amazon GuardDuty should show us the increased costs or decreased costs if we implement it or don't implement it, and that would be a good feature request, particularly with all products within AWS, just for cloud products in general because there are times features are implemented, but once they're deployed, they don't tell you about costs that would be generated along with those features. After features are deployed, there should a summary of the costs that would be generated, and projected based on current usage, so they would give us the option to figure out how long we're going to use those features and the option to keep those on or turn those off. If more services were like that, a lot more people would use those on the cloud."
"The solution has to be integrated with new services that AWS adds like QuickSight, Managed Airflow, AppFlow and MWAA."
"For the next release, they could provide IPS features as well."
"For me, I would say just the presentation of findings, like the dashboards and other stuff, could be improved a bit."
"One improvement I would suggest for AWS GuardDuty is the ability to assign findings to specific users or groups, facilitating better communication and follow-up actions."
"There are also some loopholes because it's a new product that they have recently migrated to the cloud. We do see some issues with the policies we have assigned when it comes to a particular account. There are some issues with system support, such as a particular server kernel version that is not supported."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security could improve connections with different types of authentication and user groups concerning cloud services."
"The initial setup can be complex for the inexperienced."
"They should provide a way for users to see violations for specific compliance."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security seems to have a preference for AWS Cloud over Azure and would be improved by focusing equally on both."
"The workbook insights generate a massive list, making it inconvenient to review."
"Securing S3 using Trend Vision One - Cloud Security can cost too much. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has a tool that requires lots of privileges. From my understanding, it's only for static application testing, so they need to add dynamic application testing, and there should be more collaboration with the application testing tools on the market. We have not used this product, and I don't know if they plan to decommission it or something. They should focus on application security because this tool's unique feature is multi-cloud support. However, they should improve integration with tools for these kinds of use cases, especially application security and dynamic scanning. For example, I would like it to support Dell SecureOps. I'd also like to see some enhancements to API gateway security."
"The dashboard should be a bit more intuitive."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
AWS GuardDuty is ranked 4th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 20 reviews while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 7th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 17 reviews. AWS GuardDuty is rated 8.2, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of AWS GuardDuty writes "A stellar threat-detection service that has helped bolster security against malicious threats". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". AWS GuardDuty is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Wiz and Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, whereas Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, AWS Security Hub and Orca Security. See our AWS GuardDuty vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.