We performed a comparison between ESET Endpoint Protection Platform and Seqrite Endpoint Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"It is stable and scalable."
"The ease of deployment and configuration is valuable. It's very easy compared to other vendors like Sophos. Sophos' configuration is complex. Fortinet is a lot easier to understand. You don't need a lot of admin knowledge to do the configuration."
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"Impressive detection capabilities"
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"I rate ESET Endpoint Security eight out of 10 for ease of setup. Setting up ESET can be straightforward or complicated depending on the customer's environment. The deployment time varies, but it's typically around five days. We have a team of four or five people involved in the deployment. Only one person is needed for maintenance. The only maintenance is adjusting the configuration of the dashboard."
"The administration is its most valuable feature as I can see all versions in one place."
"The solution is very lightweight and does not consume that much processor in terms of CPU utilization. The centralized management system is very good."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"In terms of the current global landscape, it is a great solution."
"ESET provides good protection."
"The maintenance is easy."
"ESET Endpoint Security's best feature is that it's invisible until it detects a problem."
"The only thing that I have found useful is that I have an overview of my systems in the networks."
"We found the DLP to be innovative and useful."
"The solution is stable."
"The overall performance of the server and the dashboard are the most interesting aspects of the solution."
"The setup process was easy for our remote clients and us as well."
"Seqrite Endpoint Security provides external protection in terms of hard drives."
"Seqrite Endpoint Security is a good solution."
"The update process and policy control are good."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"There's room for improvement in the quick response time and technical support for integration issues, especially when dealing with multiple vendors."
"We've encountered challenges during API deployment, occasionally resulting in unstable environments."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"I think that ESET is a little too heavy on the CPU."
"The solution could be more user-friendly."
"In terms of what is lacking in ESET, it really would need more features for the users when they are working outside of the corporate network."
"The solution is not ideal for use in large enterprises"
"The management of the solution isn't as clear as it could be. They could adjust that to make it a better product."
"The integration capabilities might be lacking a bit."
"It would be great to have VIP functions added to the solution in a future release."
"We do get false positives."
"The solution needs to improve stability."
"It should be able to detect and report any ransomware attack but currently, it doesn't detect and it doesn't report any."
"Endpoint Security would be improved by adding DLP."
"The solution could improve by providing better security and a cloud base version."
"We would like the solution to have integration with other security solutions so that we can have a single base for monitoring all the security incidents and concerns."
"The product or service could be improved by incorporating SIEM integrations to enable the collection of logs."
"The solution could integrate with other products to provide a comprehensive protection strategy."
"I don't feel that the scalability part of Seqrite Endpoint Security is better than the other products in the market."
More ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is ranked 9th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 99 reviews while Seqrite Endpoint Security is ranked 25th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 21 reviews. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is rated 8.2, while Seqrite Endpoint Security is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of ESET Endpoint Protection Platform writes "Easy to set up with good security and rapidly improving capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Seqrite Endpoint Security writes "Effectively detects malicious files and blocks sign-ins but needs integrations". ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, CrowdStrike Falcon and SentinelOne Singularity Complete, whereas Seqrite Endpoint Security is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, Intercept X Endpoint, Trend Vision One Endpoint Security and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. See our ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.